Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The SF-36 summary scales: problems and solutions.

D Wilson, J Parsons, G Tucker

    Sozial- Und Praventivmedizin
    |February 24, 2001
    PubMed
    Summary

    Traditional scoring of the SF-36 health survey

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Index of suspicion. Case 3. Diagnosis: septic arthritis.

    Pediatrics in review·2001
    Same author

    The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE): check list for the purchase of washer-disinfectors for flexible endoscopes. ESGE Guideline Committee.

    Endoscopy·2000
    Same author

    Why nurses need to advocate for Medicare by opposing contracting out.

    Alberta RN·2000
    Same author

    Glioblastoma induction after radiosurgery for meningioma.

    Lancet (London, England)·2000
    Same author

    The low prevalence of shiga-toxin production among sorbitol non-fermenting Escherichia coli urinary tract isolates does not warrant routine screening.

    Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America·2000
    Same author

    A prospective economic evaluation of basiliximab (Simulect) therapy following renal transplantation.

    Clinical transplantation·2000

    Area of Science:

    • Health Outcomes Measurement
    • Psychometrics
    • Survey Research

    Background:

    • The SF-36 is a widely used health survey assessing physical and mental health.
    • Traditional scoring methods for SF-36 summary scales may not accurately reflect underlying subscale scores.
    • Accurate scoring is crucial for reliable health status assessment.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the accuracy of SF-36 summary scales in reflecting their subscales.
    • To compare traditional scoring methods with alternative approaches.

    Main Methods:

    • Exploratory factor analysis (principle components analysis, orthogonal/oblique rotation) and confirmatory factor analysis (structural equation modeling) were used.
    • Factor coefficients were derived and applied to two Australian population surveys.
    • SF-36 summary scores were compared with underlying subscale scores across different health states.

    Main Results:

    • Traditional scoring methods (exploratory factor analysis) failed to accurately represent SF-36 subscales.
    • Structural equation modeling in confirmatory factor analysis yielded accurate summary scores reflecting subscales.
    • The confirmatory factor analysis approach produced expected scores across various health states.

    Conclusions:

    • Traditional SF-36 scoring methods can produce misleading results.
    • Structural equation modeling offers a more accurate approach for SF-36 summary scale scoring.
    • Caution is advised when using traditional SF-36 summary scales; alternative coefficient development is recommended.

    Related Experiment Videos