Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026

07:13
Phenotyping Mouse Pulmonary Function In Vivo with the Lung Diffusing Capacity
Published on: January 6, 2015
How to calculate the single-breath nitric oxide diffusing capacity in rabbits
1Department of Physiology, University of Bonn, Germany. h.heller@uni-bonn.de
Pflugers Archiv : European Journal of Physiology
|February 24, 2001
Summary
Comparing nitric oxide (NO) measurement methods for pulmonary gas exchange, this study found that longer breath-holds reduce calculation errors. Ogilvie's method is recommended when the three-equation technique is unavailable.
Area of Science:
- Pulmonary Physiology
- Respiratory Medicine
- Gas Exchange Measurement
Background:
- Nitric oxide (NO) serves as a key indicator gas for assessing alveolar-capillary gas exchange.
- Pulmonary gas uptake is clinically measured using single-breath diffusing capacity for NO (DL,NO).
- Various algorithms exist for DL,NO calculation, necessitating accuracy comparisons.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of commonly used algorithms for calculating DL,NO.
- To evaluate the impact of breath-hold duration on DL,NO calculation accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Single-breath experiments were conducted on 12 artificially ventilated rabbits.
- Breath-hold durations of 2, 4, 6, and 8 seconds were employed.
- DL,NO was calculated using conventional algorithms (Ogilvie, Jones and Meade) and compared against a three-equation technique reference.
Main Results:
- Deviations between conventional DL,NO methods and the reference decreased linearly with increasing NO uptake duration.
- Mean deviations reduced from 16.6% (Jones and Meade) or 7.7% (Ogilvie) at 4s to 5.7% (Jones and Meade) or 2.4% (Ogilvie) at 10s.
- Conventional methods showed larger mean values due to subtracting inflation time from breath-hold duration.
Conclusions:
- The accuracy of DL,NO calculation is significantly influenced by breath-hold duration.
- Ogilvie's procedure provides a more accurate DL,NO estimation compared to Jones and Meade's method when using conventional solutions.
- Ogilvie's method is recommended when the more complex three-equation technique is not feasible.

