Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Perception and preference in short-term word priming.

D E Huber1, R M Shiffrin, K B Lyle

  • 1Department of Psychology, Indiana University at Bloomington, USA. dhuber@psych.colorado.edu

Psychological Review
|February 24, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Treatment of a Chronic Vulvar Wound by Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT).

Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology·2022
Same author

An expectancy model for memory search.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2011
Same author

Popliteal vein compression under general anaesthesia.

European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery·2008
Same author

Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2001
Same author

An ARC-REM model for accuracy and response time in recognition and recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2001
Same journal

Perception and action as one: Re-integrating research on human action through event files.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Associative learning explains "intuitive statistics" in animals.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A reciprocal model of practice and skill: Navigating between dropout and expertise.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

The relative psychometric function: A general analysis framework for relating psychological processes.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A taxonomy of discriminatory behavior.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Extreme-value signal detection theory for recognition memory: The parametric road not taken.

Psychological review·2026
See all related articles

The Responding Optimally With Unknown Sources of Evidence (ROUSE) theory explains priming effects by how evidence is discounted. Findings show processing methods influence word preference, with perception enhancement only in associative priming.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Perception Science

Background:

  • Short-term priming influences word recognition.
  • Theories of priming often struggle to differentiate perceptual and preferential effects.
  • The Responding Optimally With Unknown Sources of Evidence (ROUSE) theory offers a framework for understanding priming.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test the ROUSE theory across different priming types (associative, orthographic-phonemic, repetition).
  • To investigate how active versus passive prime processing affects subsequent word preference.
  • To differentiate perceptual enhancement from preferential effects in priming.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized two-alternative forced-choice testing to measure perceptual identification.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed paradigms designed to separate preferential and perceptual components of priming.
  • Manipulated prime processing (active vs. passive viewing).

    • Main Results:

    • ROUSE theory successfully explains priming effects based on evidence discounting.
    • Active prime processing led to reverse preference compared to passive processing.
    • Significant perceptual enhancement was observed only with associative priming, and its magnitude was small relative to preference effects.

    Conclusions:

    • The ROUSE model effectively accounts for observed priming phenomena by considering evidence discounting.
    • Processing methods critically influence the balance between perceptual and preferential priming effects.
    • Perceptual benefits of priming are limited, particularly outside of associative contexts.