Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hypothesis testing in a rule discovery problem: when a focused procedure is effective.

S Rossi1, J P Caverni, V Girotto

  • 1Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive et Pathologique, UPRES EA 1774, Université de Caen, Esplanade de la Paix, 14032 Caen, France. rossi@scvie.unicaen.fr

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology
|February 24, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Relationship between quantitative ultrasound parameters at the calcaneus and health-related quality of life in postmenopausal Italian women: the FEDRO study.

Calcified tissue international·2013
Same author

Compensation to whole body active rotation perturbation.

Gait & posture·2013
Same author

Interleukin-1β alters the sensitivity of cannabinoid CB1 receptors controlling glutamate transmission in the striatum.

Neuroscience·2013
Same author

Overuse of prescription and OTC non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis.

International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology·2013
Same author

Detrimental effects of ocean acidification on the economically important Mediterranean red coral (Corallium rubrum).

Global change biology·2013
Same author

Radiofrequency ablation of metastatic lesions from breast cancer.

Journal of ultrasound·2013
Same journal

Relations between emotion, illusory word perception, and orthographic repetition blindness: tests of binding theory.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Causal and noncausal conditionals: an integrated model of interpretation and reasoning.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Phonological similarity effects in verbal complex span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

By which name should I call thee? The consequences of having multiple names.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Stimulus similarity decrements in children's working memory span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Lag-1 sparing in the attentional blink: benefits and costs of integrating two events into a single episode.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
See all related articles

Participants better solved hypothesis testing problems when given negative evidence, or counter-examples. This finding highlights the importance of negative evidence in rule discovery and hypothesis revision.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Making
  • Scientific Reasoning

Background:

  • Hypothesis testing is a fundamental aspect of human reasoning and scientific discovery.
  • The Wason selection task is a classic paradigm for studying logical reasoning and hypothesis testing.
  • Understanding how individuals utilize negative evidence is crucial for improving problem-solving skills.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of negative evidence on hypothesis testing performance.
  • To compare rule discovery in a standard Wason problem versus a counter-example version.
  • To determine if negative evidence facilitates hypothesis revision and problem-solving.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study using two versions of Wason's rule discovery problem.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants proposed number triples to discover an underlying rule.
  • One group received an example (positive evidence), while the other received a counter-example (negative evidence).

    • Main Results:

    • Participants in the counter-example condition formed hypotheses based on the provided triple.
    • Focused testing in the counter-example condition consistently yielded negative evidence.
    • This led to forced hypothesis revision and significantly better problem-solving.
    • Participants solved the counter-example version significantly better than the original problem.

    Conclusions:

    • Negative evidence is a powerful tool for hypothesis revision in rule discovery tasks.
    • Presenting counter-examples enhances individuals' ability to test and refine hypotheses effectively.
    • Cognitive strategies for hypothesis testing can be improved by incorporating negative evidence.