Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Illusory correlations in graphological inference.

R N King1, D J Koehler

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied
|February 24, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bicycle Stage Racing.

The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
Same author

People focus on optimistic scenarios and disregard pessimistic scenarios while predicting task completion times.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2000
Same author

Probability judgment in three-category classification learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2000
Same author

Subjective probability of disjunctive hypotheses: local-weight models for decomposition of evidential support.

Cognitive psychology·1999
Same author

Confidence and accuracy in trait inference: judgment by similarity.

Acta psychologica·1996
Same author

Probability judgement in medicine: discounting unspecified possibilities.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·1995
Same journal

Configurational antecedents of employee green behavior: A mixed methods study.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

The effects of counterfactual thinking on unilateral forgiveness: Can victims do it on their own?

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

Gray swan neglect: Do forecasters account for low(ish) probability events?

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

An inductive learning intervention to improve news veracity discernment.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

Forgetting and blame: When cognitive lapses excuse and when they backfire.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

Predecisional distortion of risk information seen in icon arrays.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
See all related articles

Illusory correlation explains why people believe graphology (handwriting analysis) predicts personality, even when evidence shows it doesn't. Semantic links between words bias perceptions of handwriting-personality connections.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Forensic Psychology
  • Scientific Reasoning

Background:

  • Graphology, the practice of inferring personality traits from handwriting, persists despite lacking scientific validation.
  • Illusory correlation, a cognitive bias where perceived relationships are stronger than actual ones, may explain this persistence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of illusory correlation in the continued belief in graphology's predictive validity.
  • To examine how semantic associations influence perceived correlations between handwriting features and personality traits.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted where participants evaluated handwriting samples paired with fabricated personality profiles.
  • Experiment 1 involved random pairings, while Experiment 2 manipulated correlations between specific handwriting features and personality traits.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical analysis controlled for actual statistical associations to isolate perceptual biases.

    • Main Results:

    • Participants perceived correlations between handwriting features and personality traits consistent with graphological claims, irrespective of actual statistical relationships.
    • Semantic associations between descriptive words for handwriting and personality traits significantly biased participants' judgments.
    • This bias persisted even when controlling for objective statistical correlations.

    Conclusions:

    • Illusory correlation, driven by semantic associations, provides a partial explanation for the enduring use of graphology.
    • Cognitive biases, rather than predictive validity, may underpin the perceived effectiveness of graphological assessments.
    • Findings highlight the need to address cognitive biases in evaluating pseudoscientific practices.