Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

A reply to Zigler and Seitz.

R Neman

    American Journal of Mental Deficiency
    |March 1, 1975
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study validates the Neman et al. (1975) findings, refuting critiques regarding experimenter bias and psychometric instruments. The results demonstrate statistically significant and reliable sensorimotor assessment, supporting its use in clinical practice.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Practices in estimating mental retardation prevalence.

    Mental retardation·1976
    Same author

    Experimental evaluation of sensorimotor patterning used with mentally retarded children.

    American journal of mental deficiency·1975
    Same author

    Marketing practices and institutional services.

    The Training school bulletin·1968
    Same author

    Instructions, commonality, and word association sets.

    Psychological reports·1968
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    Area of Science:

    • Psychology
    • Neuroscience
    • Educational Measurement

    Background:

    • Critiques by Zigler and Seitz (1975) questioned the validity of Neman et al.'s (1975) study findings.
    • Key areas of concern included experimenter bias, psychometric instrument reliability, statistical analysis adequacy, chance findings, and score inflation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To rigorously re-examine the Neman et al. (1975) study conclusions in light of the Zigler and Seitz (1975) critique.
    • To address specific concerns about potential confounding factors and methodological rigor.

    Main Methods:

    • Systematic review and re-evaluation of the original Neman et al. (1975) data and methodology.
    • Analysis of psychometric instrument validity using Buros (1972) standards.
    • Assessment of statistical significance at the .05 probability level.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Experimenter bias and commitment were insufficient explanations for the observed results.
    • Psychometric instruments used were deemed reliable and valid.
    • Statistical analyses met or exceeded prevailing research standards.
    • Findings were statistically significant (p < .05) and not attributable to chance.
    • Neurological assessment results remained significant regardless of score type (raw vs. scaled).

    Conclusions:

    • The Neman et al. (1975) study's conclusions are supported upon critical re-examination.
    • Agreed-upon future research directions include multivariate analyses, defining target populations for sensorimotor interventions, and further validating the assessment profile.