Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The Helsinki Declaration: why all the fuss?

W Tadd1

  • 1Department of Geriatric Medicine, Academic Centre, Llandough Hospital, Penlan Road, South Glamorgan CF64 2XX, UK.

Nursing Ethics
|February 28, 2001
PubMed
Summary

The Declaration of Helsinki, a key research ethics document, faces proposed revisions that could weaken subject rights. This article analyzes these changes and urges nurses to engage in the ethical consultation process.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Commentary: medical decision making based on chronological age--cause for concern.

The Journal of clinical ethics·2001
Same author

Unjustified exclusion of elderly people from studies submitted to research ethics committee for approval: descriptive study.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2000
Same author

Networking ideas worldwide on ethical issues.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·1996
Same author

Responding to rights.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·1990
Same author

A bill of wrongs: why the students' Bill of Rights gets it wrong.

Professional nurse (London, England)·1989
Same author

Philosophical analysis and its value to the nurse teacher.

Nurse education today·1989

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Human Subject Research

Background:

  • The Declaration of Helsinki, established in 1964, is the international standard for ethical research involving human subjects.
  • It has been integrated into numerous guidelines for human subject research.
  • The American Medical Association proposed significant revisions in 1999.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the potential impact of proposed revisions to the Declaration of Helsinki.
  • To argue against changes that would diminish the rights and standards for human subject research.
  • To encourage nurses, particularly those in research, to participate in the World Medical Association's consultation process.

Main Methods:

  • Critical analysis of proposed revisions to the Declaration of Helsinki.
  • Examination of the ethical implications for human subject research.
  • Review of the historical context and international acceptance of the Declaration.

Main Results:

  • The proposed revisions could substantially weaken protections for research subjects.
  • Lowering ethical standards in human subject research is a probable outcome of the proposed changes.
  • The article presents arguments against the adoption of these weakening revisions.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed revisions to the Declaration of Helsinki pose a significant threat to research ethics.
  • Active engagement from healthcare professionals, especially nurses, is crucial in the ongoing ethical debate.
  • Maintaining robust ethical standards is paramount for the protection of human participants in research.

Related Experiment Videos