Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quantifying and documenting prior beliefs in clinical trials.

K Chaloner1, F S Rhame

  • 1School of Statistics, University of Minnesota, 313 Ford Hall, 224 Church Street S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. kathryn@stat.umn.edu

Statistics in Medicine
|February 27, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Collecting clinician opinions on clinical trials offers advantages for monitoring and ethical considerations. Documented beliefs, updated with interim data, help anticipate results and inform consent processes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Purified Human Pancreatic Islets, CIT Culture Media with Lisofylline or Exenatide.

CellR4-- repair, replacement, regeneration, & reprogramming·2019
Same author

Localization and behaviors in null mice suggest that ASIC1 and ASIC2 modulate responses to aversive stimuli.

Genes, brain, and behavior·2013
Same author

Effect of primer selection on estimates of GB virus C (GBV-C) prevalence and response to antiretroviral therapy for optimal testing for GBV-C viremia.

Journal of clinical microbiology·2006
Same author

Effect of early and late GB virus C viraemia on survival of HIV-infected individuals: a meta-analysis.

HIV medicine·2006
Same author

A Bayesian stopping rule for a single arm study: With a case study of stem cell transplantation.

Statistics in medicine·2005
Same author

Effect of GB virus C on response to antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected Brazilians.

HIV medicine·2005

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials
  • Medical Ethics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Subjective prior beliefs from clinicians are valuable for clinical trial design and monitoring.
  • Two large prophylactic treatment trials in HIV-positive populations serve as case studies.
  • Clinician opinions can provide insights into equipoise and uncertainty.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the advantages of collecting and documenting clinician prior beliefs in clinical trials.
  • To show how these beliefs can be integrated into trial monitoring using Bayesian methods.
  • To highlight the ethical importance of eliciting prior beliefs for informed consent and IRB review.

Main Methods:

  • Elicited opinions from 58 practicing HIV clinicians regarding two large prophylactic treatment trials.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed approximate Bayesian methods to update prior beliefs with interim trial data.
  • Documented subjective prior beliefs to augment the trial monitoring process.

    • Main Results:

    • Demonstrated a method for updating prior clinician beliefs with interim trial data to form posterior beliefs.
    • Showcased how posterior beliefs can help monitoring boards anticipate clinician reactions to trial outcomes.
    • Emphasized the utility of documented prior beliefs for ethical considerations.

    Conclusions:

    • Collecting and documenting clinician prior beliefs enhances clinical trial monitoring and ethical review.
    • Bayesian updating of prior beliefs provides valuable insights for trial interpretation.
    • Eliciting prior beliefs is crucial for informed consent and Institutional Review Board (IRB) processes.