Related Experiment Videos
Attempts to establish phencyclidine and cocaine discrimination without error
1University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, USA.
Behavioural Pharmacology
|November 1, 1991
Summary
Researchers trained pigeons to discriminate drugs like phencyclidine (PCP) and cocaine. Training methods, with or without errors, ultimately yielded similar drug discrimination and generalization patterns in pigeons.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral pharmacology
- Animal models of drug discrimination
Background:
- Drug discrimination studies in pigeons are crucial for understanding drug effects.
- Training procedures can influence the development of stimulus control.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of "training without errors" versus "training with errors" on drug discrimination in pigeons.
- To assess stimulus generalization patterns for phencyclidine (PCP) and cocaine.
Main Methods:
- Pigeons were trained to discriminate phencyclidine (PCP) or cocaine from saline using second-order schedules.
- A "training without errors" procedure involved gradually increasing the intensity of a visual stimulus on the incorrect key.
- Stimulus generalization was assessed by testing with other drugs.
Main Results:
- Initially, "training without errors" reduced errors, but errors increased as stimulus intensity rose.
- No significant differences in stimulus control or generalization curves were found between training methods for PCP or cocaine.
- Cocaine discrimination showed broad generalization to other drugs, suggesting potential lack of stimulus specificity.
Conclusions:
- The choice of training procedure (with or without errors) did not significantly impact the final drug discrimination or generalization in pigeons.
- The cocaine stimulus may lack specificity under certain conditions, as evidenced by broad generalization patterns.