Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Choosing priorities.

J A Gray

    Journal of Medical Ethics
    |June 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Dr. Gray questions how to set priorities, suggesting a focus on the process rather than just the outcomes. He explores criteria, principles, and individuals to guide decision-making in priority setting.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Measurement of the charge asymmetry in top quark pair production in <i>pp</i> collisions at [Formula: see text] using the ATLAS detector.

    The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015
    Same author

    Search for lepton flavour violation in the <i>eμ</i> continuum with the ATLAS detector in [Formula: see text]<i>pp</i> collisions at the LHC.

    The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015
    Same author

    Measurement of [Formula: see text] production with a veto on additional central jet activity in <i>pp</i> collisions at [Formula: see text] TeV using the ATLAS detector.

    The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015
    Same author

    Measurement of the top quark mass with the template method in the [Formula: see text] channel using ATLAS data.

    The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015
    Same author

    Search for heavy neutrinos and right-handed <i>W</i> bosons in events with two leptons and jets in <i>pp</i> collisions at [Formula: see text] with the ATLAS detector.

    The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015
    Same author

    Measurement of <i>τ</i> polarization in <i>W</i>→<i>τν</i> decays with the ATLAS detector in <i>pp</i> collisions at [Formula: see text].

    The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015
    Same journal

    Ethics briefing.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Medical ethics and categorisation.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Normalising transparency: an argument for requiring generative AI use declarations in all manuscripts-with a call for commentaries.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Health Policy
    • Decision Science

    Background:

    • Priority setting is crucial in healthcare and public policy.
    • Current debates often focus on 'what' to prioritize, overlooking 'how'.
    • Government priority discussions have been criticized for being too general.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the methodology of priority setting.
    • To provide guidelines for 'how' to choose priorities.
    • To address the challenge of diverse individual priorities.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of arguments for and against different priority-setting approaches.
    • Examination of criteria, principles, and the role of individuals in decision-making.
    • Discussion of existing criticisms of generalized priority discussions.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The article outlines pros and cons of various priority-setting arguments.
    • It attempts to offer more specific guidelines for decision-making.
    • Acknowledges the difficulty in establishing universal guidelines due to differing priorities.

    Conclusions:

    • The 'how' of priority setting deserves more attention than 'what'.
    • Developing specific guidelines for priority setting is challenging but necessary.
    • Understanding diverse perspectives is key to effective priority setting.