Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Assessing Cerebral Autoregulation via Oscillatory Lower Body Negative Pressure and Projection Pursuit Regression
Published on: December 10, 2014
Rethinking physiologic stability: touch and intracranial pressure
1School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Insights
Touch and talking significantly impact physiologic stability in children with intracranial hypertension. Gentle touch, especially when combined with talking, can stabilize intracranial pressure (ICP), particularly when the ICP is already unstable.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Intensive Care
- Neuroscience
- Nursing Care
Background:
- Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is crucial for managing children with intracranial hypertension.
- The impact of non-procedural nursing and parental touch on ICP stability is not fully understood.
- Physiologic stability in critically ill children is influenced by various caregiving interactions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between nursing/parental touch and intracranial pressure (ICP) stability in children.
- To determine if touch and talking influence ICP levels in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients.
- To analyze the contingent nature of ICP stability in response to caregiver touch.
Main Methods:
- Reanalysis of data from eight children with intracranial hypertension and invasive ICP monitoring.
- Analysis of 149 clusters of spontaneous touch/talking and 23 episodes of investigator touch (without talking).
- ICP stability defined by peak-to-trough amplitude relative to resting variability; comparison of ICP tracing before and after touch interventions.
Main Results:
- Spontaneous touch/talking was rarely followed by ICP changes exceeding resting variability.
- Investigator stroking without talking did not result in significant ICP changes.
- ICP stability was more likely to improve when touch/talking occurred during an unstable ICP baseline (twice as likely).
Conclusions:
- Non-procedural touch, particularly with talking, appears to promote ICP stability in critically ill children.
- The impact of touch on ICP is contingent on the pre-existing ICP stability.
- Findings suggest incorporating gentle touch and communication into caregiving practices for children with intracranial hypertension.
Abstract:
The purpose of this research was to examine the contingent nature of physiologic stability with respect to the impact of nursing and parental care touch on intracranial pressure (ICP) in children. Data were reanalyzed from those previously collected in eight children in a pediatric intensive care unit who had intracranial hypertension from a variety of causes and whose ICP was invasively monitored. One hundred forty-nine clusters of spontaneous touch/talking were available for analysis after those occurring close in time to procedures and drugs affecting ICP were dropped. Twenty-three episodes of investigator touch (without talking) were also analyzed. ICP stability was defined as any tracing over a defined time period in which the peak-to-trough amplitude did not exceed twice the calculated resting variability. Such an approach allowed classification and counting of stable versus unstable baselines, and stable versus unstable responses to touch. Therefore, ICP stability was examined by comparing the stability of the ICP tracing the last minute prior to a cluster of nonprocedural touch (baseline) with the first minute after the cluster. Clusters of spontaneous touch were nearly always associated with talking to the child and rarely were followed by change in level of ICP greater than that child's ICP variability at rest. Investigator stroking without talking never was followed by a significant change in level of ICP. There was a contingent relationship between stability of the ICP tracing prior to a cluster of touching/talking such that the probability of ICP becoming more stable when the touch/talk occurred on an unstable baseline was twice that of touch/talk occurring on an stable baseline.
Related Concept Videos
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Increased Intracranial Pressure l: Introduction
Increased Intracranial Pressure ll: Pathophysiology
Cerebral Edema l: Introduction
Cytotoxic Edema: Pathophysiology

