Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Acellular allograft dermal matrix: immediate or delayed epidermal coverage?

A M Munster1, M Smith-Meek, A Shalom

  • 1Baltimore Regional Burn Center, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center and the Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, 4940, Eastern Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA. amunster@jhmi.edu

Burns : Journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries
|February 28, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A changing landscape: Temporal trends in incidence and characteristics of patients hospitalized with venous thromboembolism 2006-2015.

Thrombosis research·2019
Same author

Burns and diabetes.

Annals of burns and fire disasters·2011
Same author

Protective effect of human recombinant copper-zinc superoxide dismutase (hr-cuznsod) on intermediate burn survival in rats.

Annals of burns and fire disasters·2011
Same author

The long-term consequences of lightning injuries.

Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries·2001
Same author

Activation of blood coagulation in pigs following lower limb gunshot trauma.

Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis·2001
Same author

Intraoperative positioning for circumferential extremity burns.

Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries·2001
Same journal

Development of the pediatric patient scale of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) for burn scars: A qualitative study.

Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries·2026
Same journal

Aloe vera barbadensis extract regenerator with metabolic regulatory functions promotes skin regeneration and reduces fibrosis deposition in diabetic burn model pigs.

Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries·2026
Same journal

Shock wave therapy versus conventional physical therapy for partial-thickness forearm burn scars: A randomized controlled trial.

Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries·2026
Same journal

Hyperpyrexia in major burn injury: describing the epidemiology and evaluating the effectiveness of an intravascular temperature management device.

Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries·2026
Same journal

Development and validation of a nomogram model for mortality risk in burn patients: Triglyceride-glucose index as an independent novel prognostic marker.

Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries·2026
Same journal

Self-management interventions for burn survivors: A literature review among patients with burns and other comparable chronic conditions.

Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries·2026
See all related articles

Immediate skin grafting using deantigenized dermal matrix and autograft shows promising results for burn wound healing. This method offers faster donor site healing compared to standard split-thickness grafts.

Area of Science:

  • Regenerative Medicine
  • Wound Healing
  • Dermatology

Background:

  • Burn injuries necessitate effective skin grafting techniques.
  • Deantigenized dermal matrices offer a potential scaffold for tissue regeneration.
  • Optimizing graft take and donor site healing remains a clinical challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of immediate versus delayed grafting of deantigenized dermal matrix with autografts for burn wounds.
  • To evaluate graft take and scar formation.
  • To assess donor site healing times.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective, randomized study involving seventeen patients with freshly excised burn wounds.
  • Comparison of three grafting strategies: immediate deantigenized dermal matrix with autograft, delayed grafting with allograft protection, and standard split-thickness autograft.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of graft take and Vancouver scar scores up to 1 year post-grafting.

    • Main Results:

    • No statistically significant differences in graft take or Vancouver scar scores were observed between the groups.
    • Thin donor sites used for dermal matrix coverage demonstrated significantly faster healing (P<0.001) compared to standard split-thickness control graft sites.
    • Immediate grafting with deantigenized dermal matrix and autograft yielded acceptable late results.

    Conclusions:

    • Immediate grafting of deantigenized dermal matrix with thin autograft is a viable and effective treatment for burn wounds.
    • This approach leads to faster donor site healing than conventional split-thickness grafts.
    • The technique provides acceptable long-term outcomes for burn scar management.