Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Differences between two transpalatal arch systems upon first-, second-, and third-order bending activation.

H Hoederath1, C Bourauel, D Drescher

  • 1Department of Orthodontics, University of Bonn, Germany.bourauel@uni-bonn.de

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics = Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/Official Journal Deutsche Gesellschaft Fur Kieferorthopadie
|March 3, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Periapical surgery and different root obturation protocols for upper central incisor: A finite elements analysis.

Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft·2024
Same author

Changes in the distribution of occlusal forces in the course of the orthodontic retention phase : A prospective cohort study.

Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie·2023
Same author

A method to calibrate fetal μCT scans using histological sections from the same specimens.

Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft·2021
Same author

Definition of a drilling protocol for mini dental implants in different bone qualities.

Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft·2020
Same author

Increased tooth mobility after fixed orthodontic appliance treatment can be selectively utilized for case refinement via positioner therapy - a pilot study.

BMC oral health·2020
Same author

PEKK-made indirect temporary crowns and bridges: a clinical pilot study.

Clinical oral investigations·2018

This study compared two transpalatal arch systems for orthodontic tooth movement. The MIA system provided higher forces and moments for first-order and rotation movements, while the Burstone system was more effective for tipping.

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Dental Mechanics

Background:

  • Transpalatal arches are crucial orthodontic appliances used for anchorage and tooth movement in various dimensions.
  • Existing systems, such as Goshgarian-type (MIA) and Burstone TMA lingual arches, exhibit varying clinical suitability for different activations.
  • Understanding the force systems and efficacy of activated arches is essential for optimizing orthodontic treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To experimentally compare the force systems and efficacy of activated MIA and Burstone transpalatal arch systems.
  • To evaluate the performance of these systems in correcting various simulated malpositions (first-, second-, and third-order).

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the Orthodontic Measurement and Simulation System (OMSS) to analyze force systems and efficacy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Tested symmetrical expansion/compression, distal rotation, unilateral distal tipping, and buccal root torque activations.
  • Measured forces and moments generated by MIA and Burstone systems using specific archwires and attachments.

    • Main Results:

    • MIA arches generated significantly higher forces (up to 4.4 N) and moments (39 Nmm) in first-order and rotation activations compared to Burstone TMA arches (1.8 N, 14 Nmm).
    • Burstone system achieved 80% correction in tipping (second-order), while MIA achieved only 30% due to attachment design.
    • Burstone attachments showed significant loss of torque in third-order activations due to deformation, whereas MIA demonstrated higher effectiveness.

    Conclusions:

    • Both MIA and Burstone systems effectively correct malpositions, but with system-specific strengths and weaknesses.
    • MIA offers higher stiffness and moment delivery for rotation and first-order movements.
    • Burstone system excels in tipping correction, but its third-order torque control is compromised by attachment deformation; improved dimensional stability could enhance its overall performance.