Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ethical issues in communicating science.

J M Garrett, S J Bird

    Science and Engineering Ethics
    |March 7, 2001
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Supplemental peri-operative intravenous crystalloids for postoperative nausea and vomiting: an abridged Cochrane systematic review.

    Anaesthesia·2019
    Same author

    Clinical and molecular delineation of the 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome.

    Journal of medical genetics·2008
    Same author

    Medicaid reimbursement for prenatal smoking intervention influences quitting and cessation.

    Tobacco control·2006
    Same author

    Encephalopathy and peripheral neuropathy following diethylene glycol ingestion.

    Neurology·2005
    Same author

    Clinical neurophysiology in the intensive care unit.

    Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology·2003
    Same author

    Mentoring and the responsible conduct of research: reflections and future.

    Science and engineering ethics·2001
    Same journal

    Not Another Grocery List: Proposals for an Effective AI Ethics Implementation.

    Science and engineering ethics·2026
    Same journal

    From Biopiracy to Sustainable Knowledge Governance: Epistemic Justice and the Reconstruction of Resource Sovereignty in the Global South.

    Science and engineering ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Deliberative Lab Communication and the Practice of Ethical Science.

    Science and engineering ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Graduate Students Find Content of Responsible Conduct of Research Coursework Useful.

    Science and engineering ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Discursive Ethics as a Normative Foundation for Integrating Ethics into AI Clinical Decision Support Systems.

    Science and engineering ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Tragedies of Technology: An Exploration of Such Narratives.

    Science and engineering ethics·2026
    See all related articles

    Misinterpreting scientific findings, like a study on Turner's syndrome (XO females), can lead to biased genetic determinism in public communication. Responsible science communication requires accuracy from scientists, journalists, and skeptical readers.

    Area of Science:

    • Scientific Ethics
    • Genetics
    • Developmental Disorders

    Background:

    • A study investigating the incidence of autism and social developmental disorders in males using individuals with Turner's syndrome (XO females) was published.
    • The study's findings were communicated to the public through various media channels.

    Discussion:

    • The translation of the scientific study into public discourse, particularly in national newspapers, resulted in significant misrepresentation.
    • Initial scientific findings were exaggerated, leading to claims of "genetic X-factor" explaining male behavior and inherent gender differences.
    • This miscommunication fueled biased genetic determinism, potentially undermining social equality and misrepresenting the original research intent.

    Key Insights:

    • Poor science communication and a lack of public skepticism contribute to the misapplication of scientific findings.
    Keywords:
    Biomedical and Behavioral Research

    Related Experiment Videos

  • The transformation of nuanced research into sensationalized headlines illustrates a broader issue in science journalism and public understanding.
  • Scientific findings should not be generalized beyond their scope, especially when they appear to support existing social hierarchies.

    • Outlook:

    • Scientists must resist overgeneralizing results and actively challenge misconstructions of their work.
    • Journalists should avoid embellishing findings with unverified social significance.
    • The public needs to approach scientific news with increased skepticism, particularly regarding claims about social structures.