Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Talking about race in a scientific context.

F S Chew1

  • 1American Studies Program, Biology Department, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA. fchew@tufts.edu

Science and Engineering Ethics
|March 7, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Coexistence and host use by a large community of Pierid butterflies: habitat is the templet.

Oecologia·2017
Same author

Evaluation of clinical experience in a radiology residency program with quantitative profiling: rationale, methods, and application.

Academic radiology·2003
Same author

The case-based radiology teaching conference for residents: beneficial effect of previewing cases and using answer sheets.

Academic radiology·2001
Same author

Radiologists as clinical tutors in a problem-based medical school curriculum.

Academic radiology·2001
Same author

Diagnostic yield of CT-guided percutaneous aspiration procedures in suspected spontaneous infectious diskitis.

Radiology·2001
Same author

Osteochondritis dissecans of the tarsal navicular bone: imaging findings in four patients.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2000
Same journal

Not Another Grocery List: Proposals for an Effective AI Ethics Implementation.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

From Biopiracy to Sustainable Knowledge Governance: Epistemic Justice and the Reconstruction of Resource Sovereignty in the Global South.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Deliberative Lab Communication and the Practice of Ethical Science.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Graduate Students Find Content of Responsible Conduct of Research Coursework Useful.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Discursive Ethics as a Normative Foundation for Integrating Ethics into AI Clinical Decision Support Systems.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Tragedies of Technology: An Exploration of Such Narratives.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
See all related articles

Understanding human diversity and race is complex. Different scales help analyze varying perspectives, while constructivist listening aids in processing new information and developing emotional literacy for scientific practice.

Area of Science:

  • Education
  • Social Sciences
  • Scientific Practice

Background:

  • Understanding human diversity and race presents significant complexity for students.
  • Differing interpretations arise from data perceived at various levels and scales.
  • Developing conceptual and interpersonal skills is crucial for scientific practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present two key approaches for enhancing student comprehension of human diversity and race.
  • To explore how different scales and constructivist listening facilitate understanding complex social concepts.
  • To improve students' readiness for scientific practice through enhanced conceptual and interpersonal skills.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing different scales to analyze data perceived at varying levels, revealing relationships between perspectives.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applying constructivist listening to encourage self-examination of experiences, feelings, and understanding.
  • Integrating these approaches into dialogues about race and classroom interactions.

    • Main Results:

    • Different scales effectively illustrate how varying perspectives emerge from data.
    • Constructivist listening proves valuable for digesting complex material and fostering emotional literacy.
    • The combined approaches support mastery of essential skills for scientific engagement.

    Conclusions:

    • Employing different scales and constructivist listening are effective pedagogical tools.
    • These methods enhance students' ability to navigate complex topics like human diversity and race.
    • Mastery of conceptual and interpersonal skills is achievable, preparing students for scientific practice.