Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of information processing technologies.

J F Piniewski-Bond1, G M Buck, R S Horowitz

  • 1State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA. joanne.bond@roswellpark.org

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
|March 7, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cancer knowledge and misconceptions among immigrant Salvadorean men in the Washington, D.C. area.

Journal of immigrant health·2005
Same author

Longitudinal study of babies born to mothers enrolled in a preconception prospective pregnancy study: study design and methodology, New York State Angler cohort study.

Environmental research·2004
Same author

Environmental PCB exposure and risk of endometriosis.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2004
Same author

Allergen immunotherapy for asthma.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2003
Same author

Science, ethics, and professional public health practice.

Journal of epidemiology and community health·2002
Same author

Ethics in epidemiology and public health II. Applied terms.

Journal of epidemiology and community health·2002
Same journal

Digital divide in clinical and operational artificial intelligence adoption and implementation stages: US hospital diffusion patterns and AI deserts.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2026
Same journal

Extending the fundamental theorem of biomedical informatics: a proposal and illustrative examples.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2026
Same journal

Human factors methods for designing safe health information technology: what do the experts think?

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2026
Same journal

Equity-by-design for socially assistive robots as digital health tools.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2026
Same journal

Orchestrator multi-agent clinical decision support system for secondary headache diagnosis in primary care.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2026
Same journal

CUI-Curate: a GraphRAG-based framework for automated clinical concept curation for NLP applications.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2026
See all related articles

Automated and manual methods can extract key ideas from scientific papers for literature reviews. Combining approaches identified 74.3% of important concepts on human papillomavirus and cervical cancer.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Informatics
  • Scientific Communication

Background:

  • Literature reviews are crucial for synthesizing scientific knowledge.
  • Traditional methods of literature review can be time-consuming and labor-intensive.
  • Efficient extraction of information from scientific papers is essential for researchers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of manual data extraction versus automated "Idea Analysis" for literature reviews.
  • To evaluate the information obtainable from scientific papers using different extraction methods.
  • To assess the utility of these methods in preparing literature reviews on human papillomavirus and cervical cancer.

Main Methods:

  • Analyzed 161 articles referenced in three review papers on human papillomavirus and cervical cancer.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed a formalized, protocol-driven manual data extraction process.
  • Utilized a computerized "Idea Analysis" approach processing article abstracts.

    • Main Results:

    • "Idea Analysis" identified 68.9% of key ideas.
    • Formalized data extraction identified 27% of key ideas.
    • Combining both methods identified 74.3% of important ideas regarding human papillomavirus and cervical cancer.

    Conclusions:

    • Both manual and automated methods can reliably extract and organize information from scientific literature.
    • These tools can significantly reduce the clerical burden in preparing literature reviews.
    • Automated and combined approaches offer a valid and reproducible means to capture essential scientific ideas.