Can one unrestricted meal buffer the effects of previous pre-meal intervals on the feeding behaviour of sheep?

Varying the time since the last meal is one means of manipulating feeding motivation. In order to use this method effectively it is necessary to know whether and the extent to which effects of one pre-meal interval are carried over to affect the behaviour during the following meals. Pre-meal interval (PMI) is defined here for practical purposes, for short meals, as the time between the start of two successive meals. The possibility that one unrestricted meal might buffer the effects of an 8h as opposed to a 4h PMI on aspects of feeding behaviour was studied with eight Scottish Blackface sheep. They were fed on a regime in which they were given access to food until they finished their meal and lay down (this always occurred within 60min) at which time the remaining food was withdrawn. Feeding behaviour was recorded during the meal after these 4 and 8h intervals, as well as during the following meal 4h later.At a meal after a PMI of 8h, compared to 4h, sheep had a higher intake per meal (mean+/-S.T.D. for 8 and 4h PMI, respectively: 604.4+/-78.8 and 430.1+/-100.9g; P<0.001), a longer meal duration (27.1+/-7.5 and 21.8+/-8.1min; P<0.001), and a tendency for a higher intake rate (23.8+/-6.2 and 21.9+/-8.2g/min; P=0.11). During the following meal 4h later these differences were smaller, but intake per meal still tended to be higher (430.8+/-81.5 and 338.5+/-45.6g; P<0.06) for sheep who had previously had the 8h PMI. Meal duration (21.9+/-7.2 and 20.6+/-7.08min; P=0.28) and intake rate (21.2+/-6.1 and 18.7+/-7.2g/min; P=0.13) were no longer different.A single meal after the different PMIs reduced differences in all three aspects of feeding behaviour observed during the subsequent meal, 4h later, but differences in intake per meal were still apparent. It is suggested that an additional meal may overcome the carry-over effect.