Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Small tissue bites and wound strength: an experimental study.

Y Cengiz1, P Blomquist, L A Israelsson

  • 1Department of Surgery, Sundsvall County Hospital, SE-85186 Sundsvall, Sweden. y.cengiz@swipnet.se

Archives of Surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)
|March 20, 2001
PubMed
Summary

This study examined how stitch placement affects wound strength in midline laparotomy incisions. Researchers used 51 rats and placed stitches at distances of 3, 6, or 10 mm from the wound edge. They measured wound bursting strength immediately and after four days. Stitches placed 10 mm from the edge had higher initial strength but lower strength after four days compared to those at 3 or 6 mm. Wounds with fewer stitches (11) had fewer ruptures than those with more stitches (21). The study suggests that placing stitches 3 to 6 mm from the wound edge may improve healing outcomes. Stitch number and placement distance appear to influence wound strength and rupture likelihood.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Can gastropexy reduce the recurrence rate after paraesophageal hernia repair? A study protocol for a double blind, randomized, multicenter clinical trial.

Trials·2026
Same author

An outbreak of hepatitis A virus infection in a secondary school in England with no undetected asymptomatic transmission among students.

Epidemiology and infection·2022
Same author

Association between knowledge, risk behaviours, and testing for sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men: findings from a large online survey in the United Kingdom.

HIV medicine·2019
Same author

Comparison of the effectiveness of mitomycin-C and Viscoat on delayed adjustable strabismus surgery in rabbits.

European journal of ophthalmology·2017
Same author

Incisional Hernia: Daily Cases.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2015
Same author

Cost analysis of the use of small stitches when closing midline abdominal incisions.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2013

Area of Science:

  • Surgical wound healing research within surgical techniques
  • Biomechanics of tissue repair in experimental surgery

Background:

Midline laparotomy incisions are commonly used in surgery, and wound healing is a critical concern. Prior research has shown that wound closure techniques influence healing outcomes. However, the relationship between stitch placement and wound strength remains unclear. Established knowledge includes the general understanding that suture techniques affect tissue integrity. That uncertainty drove this study to examine how stitch placement affects wound bursting strength. No prior work had resolved the optimal distance for stitch placement in midline incisions. This gap motivated the investigation of stitch positioning relative to the wound edge. The study aimed to clarify whether proximity of stitches to the wound edge impacts wound strength. The researchers sought to determine if stitch density and placement influence bursting pressure in surgical wounds.

Purpose Of The Study:

The purpose of the study was to evaluate how stitch placement affects wound bursting strength in midline laparotomy incisions. The researchers aimed to determine if proximity of stitches to the wound edge influences wound integrity. They focused on the suture length to wound length ratio and stitch placement distance. The study sought to clarify whether closer or farther stitch placement yields stronger wound healing. The motivation was to identify optimal suture techniques for surgical wound closure. The specific problem addressed was the lack of evidence on stitch positioning effects. The study aimed to provide data on wound bursting strength after laparotomy closure. The researchers proposed that stitch placement distance correlates with wound strength outcomes.

Keywords:
surgical wound healingmidline laparotomysuture techniquestissue repair biomechanics

Frequently Asked Questions

The study found that wounds with stitches placed 3 to 6 mm from the edge had higher bursting strength after four days.

Stitches placed 10 mm from the edge had lower bursting pressure after four days compared to those at 3 mm.

The ratio was used to standardize suture techniques across all experimental groups.

The study found that wounds with fewer stitches (11) had fewer ruptures compared to those with 21 stitches.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The study used 51 Sprague-Dawley rats for experimental wound closure. Midline incisions were closed using a running suture technique. A suture length to wound length ratio of 4 was maintained across all groups. Stitches were placed at distances of 3, 6, or 10 mm from the wound edge. Wound bursting strength was measured immediately after closure and again after four days. The bursting pressure and volume were recorded for each wound. The abdominal wall rupture location was noted relative to the suture line. The researchers compared outcomes across the three stitch placement distances.

Main Results:

Immediately after closure, wounds with stitches at 10 mm had higher bursting pressure than those at 3 mm. After four days, bursting pressure and volume were lower in wounds with stitches at 10 mm. Wounds with stitches at 3 or 6 mm showed higher bursting strength after four days. The number of stitches correlated with wound bursting strength outcomes. Wounds with 11 stitches had fewer ruptures compared to those with 16 or 21 stitches. Rupture occurred outside the suture line in 14 of 17 wounds with 21 stitches. Only 6 of 17 wounds with 11 stitches ruptured outside the suture line. The results suggest stitch placement and number influence wound strength and rupture likelihood.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that stitch placement at 3 to 6 mm from the wound edge improves wound bursting strength. They suggest that 10 mm placement may reduce wound strength after four days. The study indicates that stitch number correlates with wound integrity outcomes. The findings suggest that fewer stitches may lead to better wound strength in some cases. The researchers propose that optimal stitch placement is within 3 to 6 mm of the wound edge. They suggest that stitch number and placement distance are important variables in wound closure. The results imply that surgical techniques should consider stitch positioning for better outcomes. The authors conclude that stitch placement and number influence wound strength in midline laparotomies.

Bursting pressure and volume were recorded immediately after closure and again after four days.

The authors suggest that stitches placed 3 to 6 mm from the wound edge may improve wound strength.