Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stress radiography.

J A Senall1, T A Kile

  • 1Division of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Department of Orthopaedics, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.

Foot and Ankle Clinics
|March 10, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Estimating the insertion site during retrograde intramedullary tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis.

Foot & ankle international·1996
Same author

The role of a composite, demineralized bone matrix and bone marrow in the treatment of osseous defects.

Orthopedics·1995
Same author

Modified chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus.

Foot & ankle international·1994
Same author

Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with an intramedullary device.

Foot & ankle international·1994
Same author

Hallux valgus due to cuneiform-metatarsal instability.

Journal of the Southern Orthopaedic Association·1994

Defining consistent criteria for stress radiography of the foot and ankle remains challenging. Routine imaging with careful clinical assessment may be more effective for treatment decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Radiology
  • Sports medicine

Background:

  • Stress radiography has historically aided understanding of foot and ankle injuries.
  • Consistent diagnostic criteria for stress radiography remain undefined.
  • The clinical utility of stress radiography for treatment decisions is debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the current role and limitations of stress radiography in foot and ankle diagnostics.
  • To determine the effectiveness of stress radiography in guiding treatment decisions.
  • To explore alternative diagnostic approaches for foot and ankle injuries.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on stress radiography in foot and ankle injuries.
  • Analysis of clinical case studies and expert opinions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of stress radiography findings with clinical outcomes.

    • Main Results:

    • Difficulty in establishing standardized criteria for stress radiography of the foot and ankle persists.
    • The validity of stress radiography in influencing treatment decisions is questionable without clear criteria.
    • Clinical history, physical examination, and routine radiograph interpretation appear highly effective.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardized criteria for stress radiography of the foot and ankle are needed.
    • Routine radiography combined with thorough clinical evaluation is often most effective.
    • Stress radiography may be valuable for elite athletes and in specific preoperative planning for ankle reconstruction involving subtalar instability.