Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hydrodynamic cavitation for sonochemical effects.

V S Moholkar1, P S Kumar, A B Pandit

  • 1University Department of Chemical Technology, University of Bombay, Matunga, India. v.s.moholkar@ct.utwente.nl

Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
|March 10, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Change in surface characteristics and permeability of human enamel after subjecting to radiation therapy.

Nigerian journal of clinical practice·2022
Same author

Sources of SARS-CoV-2 and Other Microorganisms in Dental Aerosols.

Journal of dental research·2021
Same author

Effect of intensifying additives on the degradation of thiamethoxam using ultrasound cavitation.

Ultrasonics sonochemistry·2020
Same author

Cotton based composite fabric reinforced with waste polyester fibers for improved mechanical properties.

Waste management (New York, N.Y.)·2020
Same author

Subgingival Host-Microbial Interactions in Hyperglycemic Individuals.

Journal of dental research·2020
Same author

Dataset on the suitability of groundwater for drinking and irrigation purposes in the Sarabanga River region, Tamil Nadu, India.

Data in brief·2020
Same journal

High-foaming modified walnut protein enhances milk coffee quality and volatile aroma profile.

Ultrasonics sonochemistry·2026
Same journal

Ultrasound-assisted deep eutectic solvent extraction of tyrosinase inhibitors from lotus seed peel powder.

Ultrasonics sonochemistry·2026
Same journal

Sonochemical cavitation-driven interfacial-selective nucleation of silver nanoparticles via silver carboxylate precursors for Ag/Si nanocomposites.

Ultrasonics sonochemistry·2026
Same journal

Scale-Dependent hydroxyl radical generation and energy efficiency in vortex diode hydrodynamic cavitation: machine learning insights toward industrial-scale applications in water treatment.

Ultrasonics sonochemistry·2026
Same journal

Ultrasound modified flaxseed protein-rice starch composite system for texture-modified soft gels: structural, functional, and swallowing properties.

Ultrasonics sonochemistry·2026
Same journal

Sustainable extraction of polyphenols from Pleurotus eryngii using ultrasound-assisted deep eutectic solvents with process optimization and biological activity.

Ultrasonics sonochemistry·2026
See all related articles

Hydrodynamic cavitation generates more pressure pulses than acoustic cavitation, offering better control over processes. This numerical study compares bubble dynamics under both conditions, aiding process optimization.

Area of Science:

  • Fluid Dynamics
  • Acoustics
  • Chemical Engineering

Background:

  • Cavitation, the formation and collapse of bubbles, is crucial in various physical and chemical processes.
  • Understanding bubble dynamics under different cavitation types is essential for process control and optimization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To numerically compare the behavior of bubbles/cavities under acoustic and hydrodynamic cavitation.
  • To analyze the effects of varying parameters on bubble dynamics in both cavitation regimes.
  • To evaluate the control and intensity of hydrodynamic cavitation versus acoustic cavitation.

Main Methods:

  • Numerical solutions of the Rayleigh-Plesset equation were used to model bubble/cavity behavior.
  • Simulations considered sinusoidal pressure fields for acoustic cavitation and linear fields for hydrodynamic cavitation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Key parameters like initial cavity size, acoustic field intensity, frequency, recovery pressure, and time were varied.

    • Main Results:

    • Hydrodynamic cavitation produced numerous small-magnitude pressure pulses, unlike the few large pulses in acoustic cavitation.
    • Parameter variations significantly impacted bubble/cavity dynamics in both acoustic and hydrodynamic cavitation.
    • Hydrodynamic cavitation demonstrated superior control over operating parameters and cavitation intensity.

    Conclusions:

    • Hydrodynamic cavitation offers enhanced control and a different pressure pulse profile compared to acoustic cavitation.
    • The numerical methodology allows for the manipulation and optimization of physical or chemical processes.
    • Experimental results on KI solution oxidation support the numerical findings, validating the approach.