Comparison of handling and acceptability of two spacer devices in young children with asthma

P L Brand1, O H van der Baan-Slootweg, J W Heynens

  • 1Department of Paediatrics, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, The Netherlands. P.L.P.Brand@isala.nl

Insights

Parents overwhelmingly prefer the NebuChamber spacer device over the Babyhaler for treating childhood asthma. This preference extends across multiple features, indicating better usability for young children with asthma.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Pulmonology
  • Respiratory Device Technology

Background:

  • Asthma is a common chronic respiratory disease in children.
  • Spacer devices are crucial for effective delivery of inhaled corticosteroids in young children.
  • Parental preference for medical devices can impact treatment adherence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare parental preference between two commonly used asthma spacer devices: NebuChamber and Babyhaler.
  • To evaluate specific features influencing parental choice in pediatric asthma management.

Main Methods:

  • An open, cross-over study involving 141 pediatric patients (5-57 months) with asthma.
  • Randomized administration of inhaled steroids via NebuChamber or Babyhaler for 2-week periods.
  • Parental questionnaires and diary entries assessed device preference, acceptability, and handling.

Main Results:

  • A significant majority of parents (68%) preferred the NebuChamber over the Babyhaler (25%).
  • Preference for NebuChamber was consistent across various features including mask fit, ease of use, and durability.
  • Child acceptability and device handling scores were comparable between the two devices.

Conclusions:

  • Two-thirds of parents favor the NebuChamber for managing asthma in young children.
  • The NebuChamber demonstrates superior parental preference due to its design and functional attributes.
  • Findings suggest NebuChamber may enhance treatment adherence in pediatric asthma care.
Abstract