Comparison of EMLA cream versus placebo in children receiving distraction therapy for venepuncture

M K Lal1, J McClelland, J Phillips

  • 1Department of Paediatrics, Peterborough District Hospital, UK.

Insights

Distraction therapy effectively reduces pain during venepuncture in children. This study found no significant difference in pain scores between children receiving Eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA) cream and those receiving a placebo when distraction was used.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Anesthesiology
  • Pain Management
  • Child Psychology

Background:

  • Eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA) cream is commonly used for venepuncture pain in children.
  • A significant number of children still experience distress despite EMLA use.
  • Distraction therapy is a cognitive-behavioral intervention with limited data on its effectiveness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of distraction therapy as a coping strategy before and during venepuncture in children.
  • To assess the necessity of EMLA cream when distraction therapy is employed.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
  • 28 children (median age 6 years) were randomized to EMLA or placebo cream.
  • All participants received distraction therapy from a play specialist during venepuncture.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in pain scores between the EMLA and placebo groups (p = 0.7).
  • Low median pain scores in both groups suggest distraction therapy's effectiveness.
  • The 95% confidence interval for the difference in pain score was -1.0 to +3.0.

Conclusions:

  • Distraction therapy appears effective in managing venepuncture pain in children.
  • EMLA cream may not be necessary for this age group when distraction therapy is carefully implemented.
  • Operator skill and patient experience are relevant factors in pain management.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos