Effect of antiangiogenic therapy on slowly growing, poorly vascularized tumors in mice

W D Beecken1, A Fernandez, A M Joussen

  • 1Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Abstract

Insights

Angiogenesis inhibitors TNP-470 and angiostatin effectively treat both slow-growing and fast-growing tumors. This challenges the assumption that antiangiogenic therapy is only effective on highly vascularized tumors.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Biology
  • Vascular Biology

Background:

  • Angiogenesis is crucial for tumor growth and progression.
  • Inhibition of angiogenesis is a promising anticancer strategy.
  • Current assumptions suggest antiangiogenic therapies are most effective against rapidly growing, highly vascularized tumors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of two angiogenesis inhibitors, TNP-470 and angiostatin.
  • To evaluate their effects on both slowly growing, poorly vascularized tumors and rapidly growing, highly vascularized tumors.
  • To investigate the impact of these inhibitors on tumor growth, vascularity, and proliferation.

Main Methods:

  • Human bladder carcinoma cell lines (slowly growing RT-4, rapidly growing MGH-U1) were xenografted into immunodeficient mice.
  • Established tumors were treated with TNP-470 or angiostatin.
  • Tumor volume, vascularity, proliferation indices, and in vitro cell proliferation were assessed.

Main Results:

  • Both TNP-470 and angiostatin significantly inhibited tumor growth in both models (P<.001).
  • Vascular density was reduced by both inhibitors, without altering in vivo proliferation.
  • TNP-470 showed a marginal decrease in in vitro MGH-U1 cell proliferation, while angiostatin did not.

Conclusions:

  • Slowly growing, poorly vascularized tumors respond comparably to rapidly growing, highly vascularized tumors.
  • Angiogenesis inhibitors TNP-470 and angiostatin demonstrate broad efficacy across different tumor growth rates and vascularization levels.
  • These findings challenge existing paradigms regarding the selective applicability of antiangiogenic therapies.