Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Minimal clinically important differences: review of methods.

G Wells1, D Beaton, B Shea

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. gwells@uottawa.ca

The Journal of Rheumatology
|March 15, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ex vivo drug screening and clustering of bladder cancers for pre-clinical treatment prediction.

Communications medicine·2026
Same author

Standardizing health outcomes for people with rheumatoid arthritis receiving disease modifying drug therapy: A rapid review of patient-decision aids and preference studies to inform the development of OMERACT Health Outcome Descriptors.

Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism·2025
Same author

Responsiveness and meaningful thresholds of PROMIS pain interference, fatigue, and physical function forms in adults with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: Report from the OMERACT Myositis Working Group.

Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism·2023
Same author

In-person versus virtual administration of the American College of Rheumatology gold standard cognitive battery in systemic lupus erythematosus: Are they interchangeable?

Lupus·2023
Same author

Early COVID-19 pandemic modeling: Three compartmental model case studies from Texas, USA.

Computing in science & engineering·2022
Same author

A Short Report Examining the Introduction of Routine Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in a Mixed Oncology Population.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2021
Same journal

Clinical Features and Outcome Measures Across Still Disease (Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Adult-Onset Still Disease) Cohorts Worldwide: A Systematic Literature Review.

The Journal of rheumatology·2026
Same journal

Concurrent Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition Disease and Gout of the Cervical Spine Presenting With Subacute Neck Pain and Radiculopathy.

The Journal of rheumatology·2026
Same journal

The Need for Weight Communication Guidelines in Pediatric Rheumatology.

The Journal of rheumatology·2026
Same journal

Bimekizumab Improves Health Status and Work Productivity, With Reduced Productivity Costs, to 3 Years in Axial Spondyloarthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis.

The Journal of rheumatology·2026
Same journal

Qualitative Analysis of Physical Activity Engagement in Women with Self-Reported SLE: The Role of Symptoms, Healthcare Providers, and the Environment.

The Journal of rheumatology·2026
Same journal

Tumoral Calcinosis-like Calcification of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Mimicking Rheumatoid Arthritis Flare.

The Journal of rheumatology·2026
See all related articles

Determining the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is crucial for clinical trial design. Most current methods focus on group changes, but future research should prioritize methods assessing individual patient changes for better clinical relevance.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes
  • Health Outcomes Research

Background:

  • Establishing a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is a critical step in designing clinical trials to ensure detected changes are meaningful.
  • This review examines various methods used to detect important changes or differences in clinical studies.
  • The study categorizes these methods based on contrasted groups, result settings, and the type of change quantified.

Framework:

  • A classification system was developed to categorize MCID derivation methods.
  • The system considers the comparison groups (e.g., treatment vs. placebo).
  • It also accounts for the context of results (e.g., inpatient, outpatient) and the nature of the quantified difference.

Implementation:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The review analyzed existing literature on MCID determination methods.
  • Methods were evaluated based on their approach to quantifying important changes.
  • The focus was on understanding how different methodologies define and measure clinical significance.

    • Implications:

    • Current MCID methods predominantly consider changes from a group perspective.
    • There is a need to develop and implement methods that focus on individual patient-important changes.
    • Future research should aim to create patient-centered approaches for defining and detecting clinically meaningful differences.