Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Valve replacement--a perspective.

S H Rahimtoola

    The American Journal of Cardiology
    |May 1, 1975
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Valve replacement surgery improves quality of life for eligible patients, but careful consideration of risks, anticoagulation, and unanswered questions is crucial for optimal outcomes.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Percutaneous suprasternal puncture (Radner technique) of the pulmonary artery in transposition of the great vessels.

    Circulation·2015
    Same author

    Revascularization of hibernating myocardium: rate of metabolic and functional recovery and occurrence of oxidative stress.

    European heart journal·2002
    Same author

    Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracies of various noninvasive techniques for detecting hibernating myocardium.

    Current problems in cardiology·2001
    Same author

    Should patients with asymptomatic mild or moderate aortic stenosis undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery also have valve replacement for their aortic stenosis?

    Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2001
    Same author

    Valvular heart disease.

    Circulation·2000
    Same author

    Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial.

    Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2000
    Same journal

    Real-World Effectiveness and Tolerability of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Octogenarian Patients With Heart Failure: Results From the PARACHUTER Study.

    The American journal of cardiology·2026
    Same journal

    ECG-Guided Conduction Pathways as a Lever to Shorten Post-TAVI Hospitalization.

    The American journal of cardiology·2026
    Same journal

    Cystatin-C versus creatinine and kidney function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a SOGALDI-PEF analysis.

    The American journal of cardiology·2026
    Same journal

    Balloon-expandable versus Self-expanding Valves in Patients with Small Aortic Annuli Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

    The American journal of cardiology·2026
    Same journal

    Drug-Coated Balloons versus Drug-Eluting Stents following Coronary Atherectomy in Severely Calcified Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    The American journal of cardiology·2026
    Same journal

    Prehospital Statin Therapy and Outcomes in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

    The American journal of cardiology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Cardiovascular Surgery
    • Medical Device Evaluation
    • Patient Management

    Background:

    • Valve replacement surgery offers significant benefits for patients with advanced aortic and mitral valve disease.
    • Current evaluation methods for valve replacement patients lack uniformity, hindering data analysis and comparison.
    • Long-term outcomes and optimal patient selection criteria require further investigation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight potential hazards and areas for improvement in the evaluation of patients undergoing valve replacement.
    • To emphasize the need for standardized data analysis methods in valve replacement research.
    • To discuss the benefits, limitations, and unanswered questions surrounding current valve replacement practices.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of existing literature and clinical data on valve replacement outcomes.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of critical factors influencing patient selection and post-operative management.
  • Analysis of the benefits and risks associated with prosthetic valves and anticoagulation therapy.

    • Main Results:

    • Aortic and mitral valve replacement can enhance both quality of life and survival in appropriately selected, symptomatic patients.
    • Sodium warfarin anticoagulation remains essential for patients with prosthetic heart valves.
    • Significant questions persist regarding ventricular function, prosthetic device selection, and cost-benefit analyses.

    Conclusions:

    • Valve replacement offers substantial benefits but requires careful patient selection, considering disease severity and potential complications.
    • Standardized data analysis and further research are necessary to address remaining uncertainties in valve replacement therapy.
    • A comprehensive assessment of cost-benefit ratios and complication weighting is vital before early-stage valve replacement consideration.