Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Multifactorial processes in recovery from aphasia: developing the foundations for a multileveled framework.

C Code1

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QG, England. c.f.s.code@exeter.ac.uk

Brain and Language
|March 15, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Health-related quality-of-life outcomes from adult cochlear implantation: a cross-sectional survey.

Cochlear implants international·2008
Same author

Perceptions of psychosocial adjustment to acquired communication disorders: applications of the Code-Müller Protocols.

International journal of language & communication disorders·2004
Same author

The public awareness of aphasia: an international survey.

International journal of language & communication disorders·2001
Same author

Profiling the membership of self-help groups for aphasic people.

International journal of language & communication disorders·2001
Same author

The functional neuroanatomy of simple calculation and number repetition: A parametric PET activation study.

NeuroImage·2000
Same author

A multinational comparison of aphasia management practices.

International journal of language & communication disorders·2000
Same journal

Measuring language proficiency in bilingual children using EEG-based neural tracking of continuous speech.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Inhibitory states modulate the processing of negated concepts in existential sentences. Evidence from ERPs" [Brain Lang. 105796].

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Evaluative processing of emotional and moral content during discourse comprehension: Insights from event-related brain potentials.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Reading-selective areas in the cerebellum in adult readers.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Effects of semantic distance and metaphorical constituent position on L2 noun-noun metaphor processing: an ERP study.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Cortical tracking of natural speech by children with developmental language disorder (DLD): An EEG speech decoding investigation.

Brain and language·2026
See all related articles

This study proposes a new framework for aphasia recovery, integrating multiple domains for managed recovery treatment. It addresses current limitations in understanding and defining recovery processes for better patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Speech-Language Pathology
  • Rehabilitation Science

Background:

  • Current understanding of aphasia recovery is largely operational and atheoretical.
  • Existing definitions lack clarity on restoration, compensation, and reorganization.
  • The interrelation between neural, cognitive, and behavioral levels is often overlooked.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop foundations for a multileveled framework for aphasia recovery.
  • To integrate knowledge from diverse domains for a managed recovery approach.
  • To improve the understanding of individual recovery processes.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual framework development.
  • Integration of knowledge from neuroscience, cognitive science, and clinical practice.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of different levels of recovery (neural, cognitive, behavioral) and stakeholder perspectives.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified limitations in current aphasia recovery models.
    • Proposed a framework that considers multiple levels of interaction.
    • Highlighted the importance of patient, relative, and clinician perceptions.

    Conclusions:

    • A multileveled framework can enhance understanding of individual aphasia recovery.
    • The proposed framework provides a basis for mapping interactions between levels for intervention.
    • This approach facilitates a more integrated and effective managed recovery strategy.