Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Computer-assisted mammographic imaging.

C R Boggis1, S M Astley

  • 1Nightingale Centre, South Manchester University Hospitals (NHS) Trust, Manchester, UK. caroline.boggis@lineone.net

Breast Cancer Research : BCR
|March 16, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Breast cancer diagnosis using scattered X-rays.

Journal of synchrotron radiation·2006
Same author

Evaluation of computer-aided detection (CAD) prompting techniques for mammography.

The British journal of radiology·2005
Same author

Computer-based detection and prompting of mammographic abnormalities.

The British journal of radiology·2005
Same author

Computer-aided detection in mammography.

Clinical radiology·2004
Same author

'Making the most of your clinical experience': an exercise in reflection.

Medical education·2001
Same author

Model-based detection of spiculated lesions in mammograms.

Medical image analysis·2000
Same journal

Exploring LTB-mediated T cell differentiation as a prognostic marker in triple-negative breast cancer.

Breast cancer research : BCR·2026
Same journal

Intraoperative NIR-II fluorescence guidance for precise tumor margin assessment and maximized tissue preservation in breast surgery.

Breast cancer research : BCR·2026
Same journal

Tumour-based DNA methylation markers of breast cancer survival: a pooled analysis of 2157 cases.

Breast cancer research : BCR·2026
Same journal

Comprehensive comparison of homologous recombination deficiency predictors in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer.

Breast cancer research : BCR·2026
Same journal

Breastfeeding shapes a unique tumor-immune landscape in pregnancy-associated breast cancer from GEICAM-EMBARCAM study.

Breast cancer research : BCR·2026
Same journal

FBXO5 regulates RPL23A to promote MDM2-mediated p53 degradation and facilitate malignant progression of breast cancer.

Breast cancer research : BCR·2026
See all related articles

Computer-assisted mammography uses algorithms to highlight potential abnormalities. This study evaluates its effectiveness in the UK

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Radiology
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Background:

  • Computer-assisted mammography systems analyze digitized images to aid interpretation.
  • Commercial systems use algorithms to detect abnormalities, prioritizing high sensitivity, which can lead to radiologist distraction via false prompts.
  • A shortage of breast radiologists in the UK necessitates exploring efficiency-enhancing technologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of computer-assisted mammography prompting systems in a UK population breast screening program.
  • To determine if these systems can increase cancer detection rates.
  • To assess the feasibility of implementing such systems within the UK's National Health Service.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing commercial computer-assisted mammography prompting systems.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of system performance metrics, including sensitivity and false prompt rates.
  • Evaluation of implementation factors within a UK population breast screening context.

    • Main Results:

    • Commercial systems often exhibit high sensitivity, leading to a significant number of false prompts that can distract radiologists.
    • The effectiveness and feasibility of these systems in a UK screening program require further investigation.
    • Potential benefits include aiding interpretation and improving location accuracy.

    Conclusions:

    • Computer-assisted mammography systems show promise but require careful evaluation in the UK context due to potential for radiologist distraction.
    • Further research is needed to balance sensitivity with specificity for optimal use in population screening.
    • Implementation feasibility must consider the specific needs and constraints of the UK's breast screening program.