Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Longitudinal Research02:20

Longitudinal Research

Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Longitudinal Studies01:26

Longitudinal Studies

Longitudinal studies are also widely used in other medical and social science fields. For instance, in cardiovascular research, they can monitor patients' health over decades to identify risk factors for heart disease, such as high cholesterol or smoking, and evaluate the long-term effectiveness of preventive measures. Similarly, in mental health studies, researchers might follow individuals from adolescence into adulthood to understand the development and progression of conditions like...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
Truncation in Survival Analysis01:09

Truncation in Survival Analysis

Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are observed.
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different reasons...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sick leave due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2023
Same author

Discussion of "Optimal test procedures for multiple hypotheses controlling the familywise expected loss" by Willi Maurer, Frank Bretz, and Xiaolei Xun.

Biometrics·2023
Same author

Geographical variation of COVID-19 vaccination coverage, ethnic diversity and population composition in Flanders.

Vaccine: X·2022
Same author

Aligning Estimators With Estimands in Clinical Trials: Putting the ICH E9(R1) Guidelines Into Practice.

Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science·2020
Same author

Generalized pairwise comparison methods to analyze (non)prioritized composite endpoints.

Statistics in medicine·2019
Same author

Reducing surgical mortality in Scotland by use of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist.

The British journal of surgery·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

Bias in estimating association parameters for longitudinal binary responses with drop-outs.

G M Fitzmaurice1, S R Lipsitz, G Molenberghs

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

Biometrics
|March 17, 2001
PubMed
Summary

This study examines bias in longitudinal binary data analysis when participants drop out. It compares various generalized estimating equations (GEE) methods to identify the most robust approach for handling non-random drop-out.

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Longitudinal Data Analysis
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Longitudinal binary data analysis is crucial in many fields.
  • Participant drop-out is a common challenge that can introduce bias.
  • Non-random drop-out requires careful consideration in statistical methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of bias on association parameter estimation in longitudinal binary data with drop-outs.
  • To compare the performance of different generalized estimating equations (GEE) approaches under non-random drop-out scenarios.
  • To explore the relationship between bias in association and mean parameter estimation.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluation of standard GEE, GEE with conditional residuals, GEE with multivariate normal estimating equations for covariance, and second-order estimating equations (GEE2).
  • Comparison of estimators based on finite sample and asymptotic bias.
  • Analysis under various non-random drop-out processes.

Main Results:

  • Different GEE estimators exhibit varying degrees of bias under non-random drop-out.
  • The choice of GEE method significantly impacts the accuracy of association parameter estimates.
  • The study quantifies the bias introduced by different drop-out mechanisms.

Conclusions:

  • Standard GEE methods can be biased when drop-out is not random.
  • More advanced GEE approaches, such as GEE2, may offer improved robustness.
  • Understanding the bias-variance trade-off is essential for reliable longitudinal data analysis.