Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sensitivity analysis for nonrandom dropout: a local influence approach.

G Verbeke1, G Molenberghs, H Thijs

  • 1Biostatistical Centre, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.

Biometrics
|March 17, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sick leave due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2023
Same author

Geographical variation of COVID-19 vaccination coverage, ethnic diversity and population composition in Flanders.

Vaccine: X·2022
Same author

Correction to: A randomized, open-label, adaptive, proof-of-concept clinical trial of modulation of host thromboinflammatory response in patients with COVID-19: the DAWn-Antico study.

Trials·2020
Same author

A randomized, open-label, adaptive, proof-of-concept clinical trial of modulation of host thromboinflammatory response in patients with COVID-19: the DAWn-Antico study.

Trials·2020
Same author

Aligning Estimators With Estimands in Clinical Trials: Putting the ICH E9(R1) Guidelines Into Practice.

Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science·2020
Same author

Generalized pairwise comparison methods to analyze (non)prioritized composite endpoints.

Statistics in medicine·2019
Same journal

Acknowledgment of Referees 2025.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a formal sensitivity analysis for longitudinal data with nonrandom dropout, assessing model robustness. The method evaluates how deviations from missing-at-random assumptions impact results using local influence, applied to rat testosterone data.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Longitudinal Data Analysis

Background:

  • Selection models for continuous longitudinal data with nonrandom dropout have been debated.
  • Skepticism exists regarding the untestable assumptions of these models.
  • Sensitivity analysis is recommended for evaluating dropout models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a formal and flexible approach for sensitivity assessment of dropout models.
  • To explore the influence of perturbing missing-at-random models towards nonrandom dropout.
  • To apply the developed method to real-world experimental data.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing local influence (Cook, 1986) for sensitivity assessment.
  • Investigating the impact of deviations from missing-at-random assumptions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applying the methodology to continuous longitudinal data from a randomized experiment.

    • Main Results:

    • The paper provides a formal framework for assessing the sensitivity of dropout models.
    • The influence of nonrandom dropout on statistical inferences is quantified.
    • The approach is demonstrated using data from a study on rat testosterone inhibition.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed local influence method offers a flexible approach to sensitivity analysis for dropout models.
    • This method addresses concerns about the untestable assumptions in selection models.
    • The study advocates for integrating sensitivity analysis into the evaluation of longitudinal data models with dropout.