Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Computational modelling of visual attention.

L Itti1, C Koch

  • 1Hedco Neuroscience Building, University of Southern California, 3641 Watt Way, Los Angeles, California 90089-2520, USA. itti@usc.edu

Nature Reviews. Neuroscience
|March 21, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Iatrogenic adrenal insufficiency as a side-effect of combined treatment of itraconazole and budesonide.

The European respiratory journal·2002
Same author

Itraconazole treatment of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Allergy·2002
Same author

Microbial load of drinking water reservoir tributaries during extreme rainfall and runoff.

Applied and environmental microbiology·2002
Same author

Sulphation of the salivary mucin MG1 (MUC-5B) is not correlated to the degree of its sialylation and is unaffected by cystic fibrosis.

Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology·2002
Same author

Altered sialyl- and fucosyl-linkage on mucins in cystic fibrosis patients promotes formation of the sialyl-Lewis X determinant on salivary MUC-5B and MUC-7.

Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology·2002
Same author

Soil surface structure effect on isoproturon and diflufenican loss in runoff.

Journal of environmental quality·2002
Same journal

Brain-spleen axis regulates learned fear.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Acetylcholine: a candidate substrate for hippocampal predictive learning?

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Astrocytes viewed through the lens of their proteomes and subproteomes.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2026
Same journal

m<sup>6</sup>A in RNA: a key regulator of brain development, function and disease.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Non-invasive deep-brain neuromodulation by transcranial radio frequency stimulation.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Heading into the wild: setting the course to natural neuroscience.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Computational models reveal five key trends in visual attention, highlighting context-dependent saliency, saliency maps, and inhibition of return. Attention and eye movements interact, with scene understanding guiding focus.

Area of Science:

  • Computational neuroscience
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Computer vision

Background:

  • Focal visual attention is crucial for processing complex scenes.
  • Understanding attentional control mechanisms is a key challenge in cognitive science.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline five emergent trends in computational models of visual attention.
  • To provide a framework for understanding the bottom-up control of attentional deployment.

Main Methods:

  • Review of recent computational models of focal visual attention.
  • Analysis of key trends including saliency, context, inhibition of return, eye movements, and scene understanding.

Main Results:

  • Perceptual saliency is context-dependent.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Saliency maps provide an efficient bottom-up control strategy.
  • Inhibition of return is vital for attentional deployment.
  • Attention and eye movements exhibit tight interplay.
  • Scene understanding constrains attentional selection.

    • Conclusions:

    • These five trends offer a framework for computational and neurobiological insights into visual attention.
    • The interplay between image-based features and cognitive factors shapes attentional deployment.