Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Three-Dimensionally Printed Microfluidic Cross-flow System for Ultrafiltration/Nanofiltration Membrane Performance Testing
Published on: February 13, 2016
Ultrafiltration of wastewater: effects of particles, mode of operation, and backwash effectiveness
K N Bourgeous1, J L Darby, G Tchobanoglous
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California at Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Abstract:
The effects that wastewater quality and mode of operation have on the performance of an asymmetric, hollow fiber, polysulfone, ultrafiltration (UF) membrane with a molecular weight cutoff of 100,000 Daltons were investigated. Performance was assessed through monitoring membrane flux, transmembrane pressure, effluent biochemical oxygen demand, and operational cost of the experimental system while treating filtered secondary, secondary, and filtered primary effluents. Fluxes achieved for filtered secondary (129-173 l/m2 h), secondary (101-158 l/m2 h), and filtered primary (20-41 l/m2 h) effluents were compared to those obtained at three other locations where similar UF systems were operated. A conceptual model of the impact of an insufficient backwash and of operating the UF system at constant flux on membrane performance is presented to explain the differences in fluxes. Employing pre-membrane granular filtration to remove a portion of the problematic particles in secondary effluent prior to UF led to optimal operational conditions. The costs associated with the operation of pre-membrane granular filtration were offset by the increase in production achieved. Although the use of recirculation could increase maintainable flux when treating a concentrated feed (e.g., filtered primary effluent), the associated costs were high. Improved UF performance was found to result from allowing flux to decline naturally, rather than using a constant flux mode of operation. The effluents produced when filtered secondary and secondary effluents were the feeds would be equivalent to an oxidized, coagulated, clarified, and filtered wastewater as per Title 22 California Wastewater Reclamation Criteria.
More Related Videos
10:37Procedure to Evaluate the Efficiency of Flocculants for the Removal of Dispersed Particles from Plant Extracts
Published on: April 9, 2016
10:53Concentration of Virus Particles from Environmental Water and Wastewater Samples Using Skimmed Milk Flocculation and Ultrafiltration
Published on: March 17, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Filtration and Urine Formation
Filtration
Dialysis
Dialysis
Acute kidney injury develops suddenly and can be caused by pre-renal causes (e.g., hypovolemia, shock), intrinsic renal causes (e.g., acute tubular necrosis), or post-renal causes (e.g., urinary obstruction). In contrast, chronic renal failure progresses gradually over time and is often...
Microbial Wastewater Treatment
Biological Treatment of Effluent and Waste Water