Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Brain areas sensitive to coherent visual motion.

O J Braddick1, J M O'Brien, J Wattam-Bell

  • 1Department of Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK. o.braddick@ucl.ac.uk

Perception
|March 22, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rurality, Deprivation and Ethnicity in New Zealand: Population Distributions and Intersecting Impacts on Mortality.

The Australian journal of rural health·2026
Same author

Proton Distribution Radii of ^{16-24}O: Signatures of New Shell Closures and Neutron Skin.

Physical review letters·2022
Same author

The tocopherol transfer protein mediates vitamin E trafficking between cerebellar astrocytes and neurons.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2022
Same author

Mental health and academic outcomes over the first year at university in international compared to domestic Canadian students.

Journal of American college health : J of ACH·2021
Same author

Analgesia - the colour purple.

British dental journal·2021
Same author

Staying safe while waiting for the vaccine: what we need to do.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2020
Same journal

Predictive models and parameter analysis for multiple tactile perceptions in skin-wet fabrics interface.

Perception·2026
Same journal

High-resolution kitsch by AI: Why society needs art, not more AI content.

Perception·2026
Same journal

Benchmarking spatial discrimination thresholds of two-frame motion defined forms compared to luminance and stereoscopic defined forms.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

Perception·2026
Same journal

Interoception, alexithymia, and motor congruency: Psychological drivers of body ownership in virtual reality.

Perception·2026
See all related articles

Detecting coherent visual motion involves extrastriate brain areas like V5 and V3A, not V1. This finding supports using motion-coherence tests for evaluating extrastriate visual function.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Global visual-motion processing is often assessed by detecting coherent motion against noise.
  • Understanding the specific human brain mechanisms underlying this ability is crucial for visual neuroscience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To localize the human brain mechanisms responsible for global visual-motion processing using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
  • To compare brain activation patterns when viewing coherently moving dots versus dynamic noise.
  • To investigate the effects of motion reversal rates and velocities on brain activation.

Main Methods:

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was employed to measure brain activity.
  • Participants viewed coherently moving random dots and dynamic noise stimuli of comparable spatial and temporal properties.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical parametric mapping was used to analyze differences in brain activation between conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • Coherent motion elicited greater activation than noise in visual areas V5 and putative V3A, but not in V1.
    • Additional activation foci were observed in the occipital ventral surface, intraparietal sulcus, and superior temporal sulcus.
    • V1 showed greater activation by noise than coherent motion, particularly at higher velocities (20 deg s-1), suggesting velocity limits.

    Conclusions:

    • Coherent-motion detection involves distinct activation patterns in multiple extrastriate visual areas beyond V5.
    • These findings support the utility of motion-coherence tests for assessing extrastriate visual function rather than V1 function.
    • Motion coherence sensitivity extends beyond the classically defined dorsal stream, indicating broader neural involvement.