Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How large is the optic disc? Systematic errors in fundus cameras and topographers.

T Meyer1, H C Howland

  • 1Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, W-201 Mudd Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics : the Journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)
|March 23, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Infrared photoretinoscope.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Orbital orientation is not visual orientation: a comment on "X-ray Vision and the evolution of forward-facing eyes" by M.A. Changizi and S. Shimojo.

Journal of theoretical biology·2009
Same author

[Sentinel lymph node in melanoma].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2004
Same author

Familial ALS in Germany: origin of the R115G SOD1 mutation by a founder effect.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2004
Same author

Can serum NT-proBNP detect changes of functional capacity in patients with chronic heart failure?

Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie·2004
Same author

Deposition of Foradil P in human lungs: comparison of in vitro and in vivo data.

Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine·2004

Different machines yield varying optic disc area measurements. Normalization factors are proposed to standardize results, confirming larger optic disc areas in Black individuals and males compared to White individuals and females, respectively.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Biometry

Background:

  • Optic disc area measurement is crucial for diagnosing and monitoring glaucoma and other optic neuropathies.
  • Variability in measurement techniques and equipment can introduce systematic errors.
  • Understanding racial and gender differences in optic disc size is important for accurate clinical interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess systematic differences in optic disc area measurements obtained from different imaging devices and algorithms.
  • To investigate potential racial and gender-based disparities in optic disc area measurements.

Main Methods:

  • A meta-analysis of 23 published studies on normal optic disc sizes was conducted.
  • Normalization factors were calculated for various instruments (Rodenstock Optic Disc Analyzer, Topcon fundus camera, Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, TopSS scanning laser ophthalmoscope) relative to the Zeiss fundus camera.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Normalized data were used to re-evaluate racial and gender differences.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant systematic differences in optic disc area measurements were observed across different machines.
    • Normalization factors were established: RODA (1.51), Topcon (1.04), HRT (1.15), TopSS (1.29).
    • Normalized results confirmed statistically significant larger optic disc areas in Black subjects compared to White subjects (0.556 +/- 0.142 S.E.) and in males compared to females (0.151 +/- .055 S.E.).

    Conclusions:

    • Measurement devices and techniques significantly impact optic disc area quantification.
    • Applying the derived normalization factors is recommended for comparing studies using different instruments.
    • Racial and gender variations in optic disc size are confirmed and should be considered in clinical practice.