Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia
Published on: December 14, 2012
The cost-effectiveness of screening strategies for amblyopia: a preliminary report
S Schlichtherle1, A Gandjour, A Neugebauer
1Institute of Health Economics & Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany. Stefanie.Schlichtherle@medizin.uni-koeln.de
Insights
The most cost-effective amblyopia (lazy eye) screening strategies involve ophthalmologists examining high-risk infants or all infants up to age one. Screening high-risk infants is cheaper per case but detects fewer children than screening all infants.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Public Health
- Health Economics
Background:
- Amblyopia, or lazy eye, is a leading cause of preventable vision impairment in children.
- Early detection and intervention are crucial for effective amblyopia treatment.
- The cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies remains a key consideration for healthcare systems.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the cost-effectiveness of five different amblyopia screening strategies for various age groups.
- To identify the most economically viable approaches for detecting amblyopia from a health insurance perspective.
Main Methods:
- A decision-analytical model was employed to evaluate screening strategies.
- The analysis considered the perspective of health insurance funds.
- Cost per detected case of amblyopia was a primary metric.
Main Results:
- Costs per detected amblyopia case ranged from 613 Euro to 1534 Euro.
- The most cost-effective strategies included screening high-risk children up to age one by ophthalmologists and screening all children up to age one by ophthalmologists.
- Screening high-risk children identified fewer cases (one-third) compared to screening all children but incurred lower average costs per detected case.
Conclusions:
- Targeted screening of high-risk infants by ophthalmologists offers a cost-effective approach to amblyopia detection.
- Universal screening of all infants up to age one by ophthalmologists is also a cost-effective strategy, albeit with higher overall costs per case.
- The choice between high-risk and universal screening depends on balancing detection rates with cost-efficiency for health insurers.
Abstract:
Five screening strategies for amblyopia in different age groups were compared according to a decision-analytical model from the perspective of the health insurance funds. Our findings indicate that the costs per detected case of amblyopia range from about 1200 DM to 3000 DM (613 Euro to 1534 Euro). The two most cost-effective screening strategies were to screen high-risk children up to the age of one by ophthalmologists and to screen all children up to the age of one by ophthalmologists. The screening of high-risk children identifies only about a third of all affected children in this age group, when compared with the number of cases detected by screening all children up to the age of one. However, the average cost per detected case of amblyopia among high-risk children is lower than the cost of screening all children in this age range.

