Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A comparison of genetic network models.

L F Wessels1, E P van Someren, M J Reinders

  • 1Information and Communication Theory Group, Faculty of ITS, TU Delft, The Netherlands. L.F.A.Wessels@its.tudelft.nl

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing
|March 27, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Systematic decision-making can help in ending long-term treatments].

Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie·2025
Same author

A systematic review on consumer acceptance of alternative proteins: Pulses, algae, insects, plant-based meat alternatives, and cultured meat.

Appetite·2020
Same author

Least absolute regression network analysis of the murine osteoblast differentiation network.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2005
Same author

Genetic network modeling.

Pharmacogenomics·2002
Same author

Linear modeling of genetic networks from experimental data.

Proceedings. International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology·2000
Same author

The migraine aura as a cause of avoidance behavior.

Headache·1989

This study compares various continuous genetic network models for analyzing gene expression data. It proposes a taxonomy to evaluate models based on inferential power, predictive power, robustness, consistency, stability, and computational cost.

Area of Science:

  • Systems Biology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • The completion of the human genome sequence necessitates advanced tools for gene interaction and function analysis.
  • Microarray technology enables large-scale gene expression analysis, driving the development of genetic network models.
  • Existing genetic network models vary, with unclear strengths, weaknesses, overlaps, and differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare different genetic modeling approaches for extracting gene regulation matrices from expression data.
  • To propose a taxonomy for continuous genetic network models.
  • To evaluate models based on key characteristics: inferential power, predictive power, robustness, consistency, stability, and computational cost.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of various continuous genetic network models.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of a taxonomy for classifying and evaluating these models.
  • Utilizing synthetic time series data to investigate model properties where applicable.

    • Main Results:

    • A proposed taxonomy categorizes continuous genetic network models.
    • Key characteristics for model comparison are defined: inferential power, predictive power, robustness, consistency, stability, and computational cost.
    • Synthetic data analysis provides insights into specific model properties.

    Conclusions:

    • A structured comparison of genetic network models is crucial for understanding their utility in gene expression analysis.
    • The proposed taxonomy and evaluation criteria offer a framework for selecting appropriate models.
    • Further research is needed to fully elucidate the performance and applicability of different genetic network models.