Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Randomized controlled trials: the control group dilemma revisited
1Statistics Group, Faculty of Science, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK. ahart@uclan.ac.uk
Abstract:
In some randomised controlled trials the nature of the therapy means that subjects cannot or should not be blinded. Such studies need careful design. Particular attention needs to be given to the choice of control group and the nature of the informed consent obtained from subjects, because these affect the precise research question being addressed. A survey of published studies was carried to investigate how these issues had been tackled. The paper summarizes key findings from the survey. If the research question is about the specific effect of a therapy sometimes a good case can be made for a second control group which is 'attention-controlled'. There is a need for more detailed justifications of such design decisions in published studies.
More Related Videos
13:20Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
Published on: December 5, 2025
08:53Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
Published on: June 6, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Group Design
Blind Procedures
Controls in Experiments
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Blinding
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...