Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Legal problems in an elective cesarean section].

K Becker-Schwarze1

  • 1Institut für Gesundheits- und Medizinrecht der Universität Bremen. kabecker@uni-bremen.de

Zentralblatt Fur Gynakologie
|March 27, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Legal assessment of Caesarean section on request hinges on treatment indication, quality, and informed consent. Comprehensive information is crucial, and while doctors can refuse, medical standards may evolve with new findings.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

About 150 births naturally after previous Caesarean section.

Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie·2010
Same journal

About lutein cysts found in hydrops foetus et placentae.

Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie·2010
Same journal

The potencies of the burner epithelium, especially a tendency to form serous epitrel, squamous and mucosal epithelium.

Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie·2010
Same journal

Two double birth defects causing obstetric difficulties.

Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie·2010
Same journal

The uterine size and fundus level in the first part of pregnancy.

Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie·2010
Same journal

The crossbar interposition.

Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie·2010

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Obstetrics
  • Bioethics

Context:

  • Legal assessment of Caesarean section on request requires evaluating treatment indication, quality, and informed consent.
  • Criminal law implications arise regarding the indication for Caesarean sections, even when consent is present.
  • Liability law necessitates comprehensive information on risks, akin to general delivery methods.

Purpose:

  • To analyze the legal requirements for assessing a Caesarean section performed upon request.
  • To explore the intersection of medical treatment legitimacy, criminal law, and informed consent in this context.
  • To define information duties for physicians regarding Caesarean sections on request.

Summary:

  • The legitimacy of a Caesarean section on request depends on indication, quality, and informed consent.
  • While consent can justify an operation without a strict medical indication, it necessitates thorough risk disclosure.
  • Current legal precedent favors natural birth, but evolving medical knowledge may necessitate re-evaluation of standards and physician discretion in refusal.

Impact:

  • Clarifies the legal framework surrounding elective Caesarean sections, emphasizing patient rights and physician responsibilities.
  • Highlights the critical role of informed consent and comprehensive risk communication in obstetric procedures.
  • Suggests a potential shift in medical standards and legal interpretation as scientific understanding advances.

Related Experiment Videos