Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Systematic reviews to evaluate diagnostic tests.

K S Khan1, J Dinnes, J Kleijnen

  • 1Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK. k.s.khan@bham.ac.uk

European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology
|March 27, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Androgen therapy and musculoskeletal health in older adults: An umbrella review.

Semergen·2026
Same author

Building trust in science: International Research Integrity Index.

Semergen·2026
Same author

Effects of polypills on cardiovascular outcomes: Meta-analysis of clinical trials and observational studies.

Semergen·2026
Same author

Methodological and reporting quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines for prenatal care on nutritional counselling in high-income countries: A systematic review.

Semergen·2025
Same author

Suicidal ideation during the perinatal period: An umbrella review of prevalence and risk factors.

Semergen·2025
Same author

Point-of-care tests in the emergency medical services: a scoping review.

Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine·2025
Same journal

Comparing effectiveness of sacrospinous hysteropexy to vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament fixation.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·2026
Same journal

Rehabilitation strategies in post menopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·2026
Same journal

Updated structured report for dynamic ultrasonography in patients with suspected or known endometriosis: Recommendations of the international society for gynecologic endoscopy (ISGE).

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·2026
Same journal

Clinicopathologic prognostic factors and the role of adenomyosis in endometrial cancer: A 25-year single-center experience.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·2026
Same journal

Mid-pregnancy cervical length and pregnancy outcomes in nulliparous and low-risk multiparous singleton pregnancies: A prospective cohort study (the Quadruple P Screening Study).

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·2026
Same journal

Major postpartum haemorrhage in nulliparous women stratified by induction and augmentation of labour and mode of birth from 2000 -2024: a population-based cohort study in the Netherlands.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·2026
See all related articles

Systematic reviews are crucial for evaluating diagnostic test accuracy. This paper details a method for systematically collating, appraising, and synthesizing primary research on diagnostic strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical diagnostics
  • Medical research methodology
  • Evidence-based medicine

Background:

  • Inappropriate diagnostic strategies pose risks to patients and waste resources.
  • Scattered research on test repeatability, accuracy, and impact hinders clinical decision-making.
  • Systematic reviews are needed for diagnostic test research, mirroring treatment effectiveness reviews.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe a systematic approach for reviewing diagnostic test accuracy.
  • To address the methodological challenges in synthesizing primary literature on diagnostic strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic collation of primary research studies.
  • Critical appraisal of study quality and relevance.
  • Synthesis of findings on diagnostic test accuracy.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A structured methodology for reviewing diagnostic accuracy literature.
  • Identification of key challenges in systematic diagnostic test reviews.

Conclusions:

  • Systematic approaches are essential for reliable evaluation of diagnostic strategies.
  • This methodology facilitates evidence-based clinical practice through accurate test assessment.