Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Field screening test methods: performance criteria and performance characteristics.

R Song1, P C Schlecht, K Ashley

  • 1HGO Technology, Inc. 5555 Ridge Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45213, USA.

Journal of Hazardous Materials
|March 27, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

First Measurement of Time-Dependent CP Violation in the Flavor-Changing Neutral-Current Decay B^{0}→K_{S}^{0}μ^{+}μ^{-}.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Measurement of the Top-Quark Production Cross Section and Charge Asymmetry at LHCb.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Searches for B^{0}→K^{+}π^{-}τ^{+}τ^{-} and B_{s}^{0}→K^{+}K^{-}τ^{+}τ^{-} Decays.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

First Evidence of the B_{s}^{0}→K^{-}π^{+}γ Decay.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

The use of urinary lateral-flow lipoarabinomannan assays for TB diagnosis in children.

IJTLD open·2026
Same author

Precision Measurement of CP Violation and Branching Fractions in B^{±}→K_{S}^{0}h^{±} (h=π, K) Decays and Search for the Rare Decay B_{c}^{±}→K_{S}^{0}K^{±}.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Co-contamination of hybrid microplastics and PFOA/GenX alters rhizosphere bacterial-fungal communities and root performance of Eichhornia crassipes.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same journal

Associations between prenatal per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance exposure and maternal fatty acid homeostasis: Nonmonotonic, compartment-specific patterns in plasma and red blood cells.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same journal

PLA vs PE microplastics with cadmium: Time-dependent divergent and microbial disruption of soil carbon and nitrogen cycling in medicinal plant soils.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same journal

A photoinitiated catalytic self-degrading composite material for efficient and stable Cu(II) directional adsorption was constructed based on the bridging synergy strategy.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same journal

Can heavy metal accumulation in crops be mitigated by microbial inoculants? A meta-analysis and machine learning.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same journal

Coupling electron snorkels with biogenic FeS<sub>x</sub>-associated interfacial structures enhances anaerobic petroleum hydrocarbon degradation.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
See all related articles

Field-portable screening tests, including qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative methods, require consistent performance criteria for reliable decision-making. A unified performance function ensures accurate evaluation of these essential field measurement tools.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Field-portable test methods are crucial for on-site toxic substance screening.
  • Accurate quantitative tests are not always available for field measurements.
  • Qualitative and semi-quantitative screening tests are vital for immediate field decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish consistent performance criteria for all field-portable test methods (qualitative, semi-quantitative, quantitative).
  • To ensure the quality and reliability of screening tests used for decision-making.
  • To provide a basis for selecting appropriate field test methods.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a unified performance function applicable to qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative methods.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of screening methods using performance curves.
  • Analysis of false negative rates, false positive rates, sensitivity, and specificity.

    • Main Results:

    • A performance function can characterize qualitative and semi-quantitative methods and relate to quantitative methods.
    • Performance curves reveal key characteristics like sensitivity and specificity.
    • Uncertainty regions associated with methods can be determined from performance curves.

    Conclusions:

    • Consistent performance criteria are essential for reliable field screening and decision-making.
    • The proposed performance function unifies criteria across different method types.
    • Understanding performance characteristics and uncertainty improves the selection and use of field tests.