Related Experiment Videos
Solvent vapour monitoring in work space by solid phase micro extraction
K Li1, A Santilli, M Goldthorp
1Emergencies Science Division, Environment Canada, Environmental Technology Centre, River Road, Ottawa, Ont., Canada K1A OH3. li.ken@etc.ec.gc.ca
Journal of Hazardous Materials
|March 27, 2001
Summary
Solid Phase Micro Extraction (SPME) offers a sensitive, solvent-less method for detecting volatile organic compounds (VOCs). A carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane fiber showed superior performance compared to traditional charcoal tubes for lab air monitoring.
Area of Science:
- Analytical Chemistry
- Environmental Science
- Occupational Health
Background:
- Conventional methods for volatile organic compound (VOC) sampling, such as charcoal tube sampling with carbon disulfide extraction, are effective but involve solvents and are time-consuming.
- Solid Phase Micro Extraction (SPME) presents a solvent-less and rapid alternative for air sampling.
- Evaluating SPME's efficacy in a typical laboratory setting is crucial for its adoption in occupational and environmental monitoring.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of Solid Phase Micro Extraction (SPME) with active sampling techniques, specifically charcoal sorbent tubes, for the analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in a laboratory atmosphere.
- To evaluate different SPME fiber coatings for their suitability in detecting common solvent vapors at ambient concentrations.
- To determine the sensitivity, repeatability, and optimal exposure time for SPME analysis of specific VOCs.
Main Methods:
- SPME was employed using two fiber coatings: a general-purpose polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and a mixed-phase carboxen/PDMS.
- The SPME method was compared against the conventional charcoal sorbent tube method for active sampling.
- Calibration studies were performed using dichloromethane (DCM), benzene (B), and toluene (T) to establish optimal exposure times and assess repeatability.
- Minimum detectable amounts (MDAs) and inter-fiber variations were quantified.
Main Results:
- The mixed-phase carboxen/PDMS fiber demonstrated suitability for VOC analysis, whereas the standard PDMS fiber was found to be inadequate.
- SPME exhibited significantly higher sensitivity compared to the charcoal sorbent tube method.
- An optimal exposure time of 5 minutes was identified for solvents like DCM, with repeatability below 20% for a wide range of organic vapors.
- The minimum detectable amount for DCM was as low as 0.01 microg/l (0.003 ppmv).
- Inter-fiber variations were within 30% at 1 microg DCM/l, indicating suitability for field monitoring.
- An actual application measuring background solvent vapor levels showed agreement within a factor of two with the charcoal sampling method, with no DCM concentrations exceeding the regulatory limit of 50 ppmv.
Conclusions:
- The mixed-phase carboxen/PDMS fiber SPME technique is a highly sensitive and efficient alternative to conventional methods for VOC monitoring in laboratory environments.
- SPME offers advantages in terms of speed, reduced solvent use, and superior sensitivity, making it a valuable tool for occupational and environmental exposure assessments.
- The method's performance characteristics, including sensitivity and repeatability, are adequate for practical field monitoring applications.