Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

General practice. Catch a falling star.

M Roland¹, M Capek, M Wearne

¹National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, Manchester University.

The Health Service Journal

|March 28, 2001

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Hammer blows to the head.

Forensic science international·2019

Same author

Quality of care assessment for people with multimorbidity.

Journal of internal medicine·2019

Same author

[Ethical, pedagogical, socio-political and anthropological implications of quaternary prevention].

Revue medicale de Bruxelles·2018

Same author

Parental separation and behaviours that influence the health of infants aged 28 to 32 months: a cross-sectional study.

BMC pediatrics·2018

Same author

Revue medicale de Bruxelles·2017

Same author

Parental separation: a risk for the psychomotor development of children aged 28 to 32 months? A cross-sectional study.

BMC pediatrics·2016

Same journal

Clouds, Silver Linings and Storm Desmond.

The Health service journal·2018

Same journal

Time to Nurture Better Services.

The Health service journal·2018

Same journal

Let Patient Experience Take Centre Stage.

The Health service journal·2018

Same journal

First Do No Harm.

The Health service journal·2018

Same journal

Sepsis Faces a New Front.

The Health service journal·2018

Same journal

Back to the Drawing Board.

The Health service journal·2018

See all related articles

A panel identifies underperforming general practitioners (GPs) through patient and professional concerns. While the system functions, it does not offer rapid solutions for performance issues.

Area of Science:

Medical performance monitoring
Healthcare quality assurance

Background:

Identifying and supporting underperforming general practitioners (GPs) is crucial for healthcare quality.
Existing systems often rely on external reporting mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the effectiveness of a panel designed to identify and support poorly performing GPs.
To understand the characteristics of GPs investigated by the panel.

Main Methods:

A panel system utilizing patient and health professional concerns to identify underperforming GPs.
Analysis of data on investigated GPs, including practice type and years in practice.

Main Results:

Doctors from small and single-handed practices are frequently investigated.

Related Experiment Videos

The average length of practice for investigated GPs is 28 years.

Panel members perceive the system as reasonably effective but slow to resolve issues.

Conclusions:

The current panel system effectively identifies GPs needing support but lacks rapid problem-solving capabilities.
Further improvements may be needed to expedite the resolution of performance concerns in general practice.