Clinical features in patients requiring reoperation after failed endoscopic procedures for hydrocephalus

The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical features of patients at risk of secondary obstruction following endoscopic fenestration. Clinical notes and endoscopic findings for 15 patients treated with endoscopic procedures were retrospectively reviewed. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) was performed as initial treatment in 4 patients with non-communicating hydrocephalus, including a neonate with myelomeningocele, and as an alternative to shunt revision in 4 patients. Two patients with non-communicating hydrocephalus caused by tumor or arachnoid cyst were also managed with third ventriculostomy. Four patients with loculated hydrocephalus underwent endoscopic septostomy. A child with an isolated fourth ventricle was treated with endoscopic aqueductoplasty. Of the 15 patients undergoing endoscopic procedure, 4 required reoperation. Of the 10 patients treated with ETV, only the neonate with myelomeningocele required a ventriculoperitoneal shunt because of failure of the initial procedure. Of the 4 patients treated with endoscopic septostomy, 2 children with loculated hydrocephalus following intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) underwent a second septostomy. In a patient with an isolated fourth ventricle following posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus, recurrence was noted 8 months after the initial procedure. He underwent a second procedure using a stent implanted into the aqueduct to maintain CSF circulation. Sufficient stomal size or implantation of a stent may be required in the under-2-year age group with hydrocephalus accompanied by IVH and associated with myelomeningocele, in whom the risk of secondary obstruction may be high.