Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Scientific dishonestry: European reflections.

P Riis1

  • 1Ministry of Science, 7 Nerievej, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark.

Journal of Clinical Pathology
|March 29, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Scientific dishonesty is a growing global concern. Data from Denmark, Finland, and Norway indicate low prevalence rates, yet highlight the need for robust national guidelines and control systems.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Isolated oculomotor nerve palsy caused by a mucocele of an aerated anterior clinoid process.

Clinical neuroradiology·2013
Same author

Preventive home visits to older people in Denmark--why, how, by whom, and when?

Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie·2007
Same author

Participating in a cancer clinical trial? The balancing of options in the loneliness of autonomy: a grounded theory interview study.

Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)·2007
Same author

Attitudes towards clinical research among cancer trial participants and non-participants: an interview study using a Grounded Theory approach.

Journal of medical ethics·2007
Same author

The extent of written trial information: preferences among potential and actual trial subjects.

Bulletin of medical ethics·2003
Same author

Attitudes towards clinical research amongst participants and nonparticipants.

Journal of internal medicine·2002

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Research Ethics
  • Scientific Integrity

Background:

  • Scientific dishonesty has gained global attention over the last 30-40 years.
  • Europe's awareness lagged behind the USA but has recently established national control systems for biomedical projects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the prevalence and types of scientific dishonesty in European countries.
  • To emphasize the need for national guidelines and control bodies to combat scientific misconduct.

Main Methods:

  • Prevalence calculated indirectly using population figures as denominators.
  • Analysis of cases charged by the Danish national control body (1993-1997).

Main Results:

  • Denmark: 1-2 cases referred/million inhabitants/year; 1 case treated/million inhabitants/year; 1 case/5 years.
  • Finland: 1-2 cases referred/million inhabitants/1-2 years.
  • Norway: Similar low prevalence rates.
  • Danish data show authorship problems (8 cases), data suppression/unwarranted use (4 cases each), and plagiarism/false methods (3 cases each) as common issues.

Conclusions:

  • Despite low calculated prevalence, scientific dishonesty requires attention.
  • National guidelines, independent control bodies, and preventive actions are crucial for maintaining research integrity.

Related Experiment Videos