Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Variation in speech perception scores among children with cochlear implants.

J Z Sarant1, P J Blamey, R C Dowell

  • 1Bionic Ear Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Ear and Hearing
|March 29, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Chronic study on the neuronal excitability of the cochlear nuclei of the cat following electrical stimulation.

Acta oto-laryngologica·1998
Same author

Studies of prosody perception by cochlear implant patients.

Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology·1998
Same author

Enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay-detected p53 protein accumulation: a prognostic factor in a large breast cancer cohort.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·1998
Same author

Modulation detection interference in cochlear implant subjects.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1998
Same author

Intracellular responses of the rat anteroventral cochlear nucleus to intracochlear electrical stimulation.

Brain research bulletin·1998
Same author

Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation.

Acta oto-laryngologica·1998
Same journal

Avoiding Cisplatin-Related Hearing Loss, Including Implementing Sodium Thiosulfate as Otoprotectant Into Daily Pediatric Clinical Practice: Proceedings Based on Evidence and Expert Opinion From the Ototoxicity Taskforce of the SIOP Supportive Care Network.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Quantifying Miscommunications in Triadic Conversations: Effects of Hearing Impairment, Hearing Aids, and Background Noise.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Weeklong Noise Exposure of 100 College Students Who Participate in Music Activities.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Cortical Auditory Neural Responses to Speech and Communicative Functioning in Normocephalic Children With Prenatal Exposure to the Zika Virus.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Perception and Production Errors in Normal Hearing Children, Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users, and Children Listening to Vocoder Simulations.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Selective Auditory Attention Engages Distinct Neural Strategies in Simulated Electric and Acoustic Stimulation Within and Across Ears.

Ear and hearing·2026
See all related articles

Factors like pre-implantation deafness duration and communication mode significantly impact speech perception scores in children with cochlear implants. These findings highlight the importance of audiological and environmental influences on auditory rehabilitation outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric audiology
  • Cochlear implant research
  • Speech perception development

Background:

  • Speech perception is crucial for language development in children with hearing loss.
  • Cochlear implants (CIs) offer a viable auditory rehabilitation option.
  • Understanding factors influencing CI outcomes is essential for optimizing patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify key factors influencing speech perception scores in children using cochlear implants.
  • To analyze the impact of audiological and environmental variables on auditory performance.

Main Methods:

  • Collected speech perception data (phoneme, word, sentence) from 167 children with Nucleus 22-electrode CIs.
  • Assessed 12 potential influencing factors, including duration of deafness and communication mode.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized analysis of covariance and Pearson correlation to identify significant factors.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified factors explaining 51% (phoneme), 34% (word), and 45% (sentence) of score variance.
    • Speech perception scores declined with longer duration of profound deafness before implantation.
    • Children using oral communication and those implanted in Sydney demonstrated higher scores.

    Conclusions:

    • Audiological and environmental factors significantly explain variations in speech perception scores.
    • Further research is needed to understand clinic-specific and communication mode differences.