Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Preparation, premedication, and surveillance.

M Lazzaroni1, G Bianchi Porro

  • 1Dept. of Gastroenterology, L. Saccco University Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Endoscopy
|March 29, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Search for supersymmetry at [Formula: see text] TeV in final states with jets and two same-sign leptons or three leptons with the ATLAS detector.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2017
Same author

Muon reconstruction performance of the ATLAS detector in proton-proton collision data at [Formula: see text]=13 TeV.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2017
Same author

Measurement of the charged-particle multiplicity inside jets from [Formula: see text][Formula: see text] <i>pp</i> collisions with the ATLAS detector.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2017
Same author

Measurement of event-shape observables in [Formula: see text] events in <i>pp</i> collisions at [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] with the ATLAS detector at the LHC.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2017
Same author

A measurement of the calorimeter response to single hadrons and determination of the jet energy scale uncertainty using LHC Run-1 <i>pp</i>-collision data with the ATLAS detector.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2017
Same author

Measurement of the [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] production cross sections in multilepton final states using 3.2 fb[Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] collisions at [Formula: see text] = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2017
Same journal

Correction: A novel technique for endoscopic stepwise clamping and resection of giant pedunculated colonic polyps.

Endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Feasibility and safety of an adaptive endoscopic resection algorithm guided by the muscle-retracting sign for early rectal cancer.

Endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Is ERCP losing its dominance to endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction?

Endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage for distal malignant biliary obstruction: It's not the tool - but knowing which one to use!

Endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Endoscopic closure of a large gastric mucosal defect using a novel endoscopic suturing device in a porcine model.

Endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Anchor clip-assisted detachable loop ligation for definitive hemostasis and closure of a high-risk bleeding gastric ulcer.

Endoscopy·2026
See all related articles

Patient sedation preferences for endoscopy vary globally. Studies highlight informed consent, optimal drug dosing, and monitoring techniques like PCO2 measurement to ensure patient safety during procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Anesthesiology
  • Patient Safety

Background:

  • Patient desire for conscious sedation during endoscopy, particularly colonoscopy, varies significantly across countries and institutions.
  • Informed patient consent and detailed pre-procedure information are crucial for patient benefit and procedural success.
  • Current literature reviews highlight ongoing research into optimal sedation practices and patient monitoring during endoscopic procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent literature on conscious sedation in endoscopy, focusing on patient preferences, drug efficacy, and safety monitoring.
  • To identify key factors influencing patient decisions regarding sedation.
  • To assess advancements in monitoring techniques for preventing complications during endoscopy.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Literature review of endoscopic publications from the past year.
  • Analysis of studies investigating patient sedation preferences and influencing factors.
  • Evaluation of research on benzodiazepines (midazolam) and propofol for conscious sedation.
  • Review of studies on monitoring techniques, including pulse oximetry and PCO2 measurement.
  • Examination of literature on bowel preparation regimens for colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Main Results:

  • Significant international variation exists in patient preference for conscious sedation during endoscopy.
  • Detailed pre-procedure information improves patient outcomes.
  • Propofol generally offers better sedation quality and shorter recovery than midazolam, though safety concerns remain.
  • Chronic respiratory failure and coronary heart disease are risk factors for desaturation during sedation.
  • Transcutaneous PCO2 measurement is more reliable than pulse oximetry for detecting hypoventilation, especially with supplemental oxygen.
  • Optimal bowel preparation methods for colonoscopy remain under investigation.

Conclusions:

  • Patient sedation preferences for endoscopy are diverse and require individualized approaches.
  • Careful drug selection, dosage titration, and advanced monitoring are essential for safe endoscopic procedures.
  • Further research is needed to establish standardized, cost-effective bowel preparation protocols.