Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Protecting research integrity.

M G Hansson1

  • 1Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Academic Hospital, Uppsala Science Park, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden. mats.hansson@bioethics.uu.se

Science and Engineering Ethics
|March 29, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Swedish CArdioPulmonary BioImage Study: objectives and design.

Journal of internal medicine·2015
Same author

Hope for a cure and altruism are the main motives behind participation in phase 3 clinical cancer trials.

European journal of cancer care·2014
Same author

A model of study for human cancer: Spontaneous occurring tumors in dogs. Biological features and translation for new anticancer therapies.

Critical reviews in oncology/hematology·2013
Same author

Is medical ethics doing its job?

Journal of internal medicine·2011
Same author

Split views among parents regarding children's right to decide about participation in research: a questionnaire survey.

Journal of medical ethics·2009
Same author

Ethics and biobanks.

British journal of cancer·2008
Same journal

Not Another Grocery List: Proposals for an Effective AI Ethics Implementation.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

From Biopiracy to Sustainable Knowledge Governance: Epistemic Justice and the Reconstruction of Resource Sovereignty in the Global South.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Deliberative Lab Communication and the Practice of Ethical Science.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Graduate Students Find Content of Responsible Conduct of Research Coursework Useful.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Discursive Ethics as a Normative Foundation for Integrating Ethics into AI Clinical Decision Support Systems.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Tragedies of Technology: An Exploration of Such Narratives.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
See all related articles

Minimizing academic fraud requires prioritizing internal controls. Establishing robust internal structures, including ethics education and documentation, is essential before implementing external measures for fraud prevention.

Area of Science:

  • Academic Integrity
  • Research Ethics
  • Scientific Misconduct

Background:

  • Fraudulent behavior poses a significant threat to the academic world.
  • Debate exists on the most effective strategies for minimizing research misconduct.
  • Approaches to fraud prevention primarily focus on internal or external control mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To argue for the primary emphasis on internal structures for fraud minimization.
  • To outline the essential components of a comprehensive strategy against academic fraud.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of internal versus external control strategies.
  • Identification of key elements for building a robust internal control framework.

Main Results:

Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Related Experiment Videos

  • Internal structures are foundational for effective fraud prevention.
  • External controls are most meaningful when supported by strong internal systems.
  • Key internal components include academic project invitation, ethics training, and documentation procedures.

Conclusions:

  • Prioritizing internal controls is crucial for minimizing academic fraud.
  • A phased approach, building internal foundations before external measures, is recommended.
  • Effective fraud prevention requires a combination of education, ethical practice, and procedural integrity.