Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The American experience: lessons learned.

L J Rhoades1

  • 1Division of Policy and Education, Office of Research Integrity, 5515 Security Lane, Suite 700, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.

Science and Engineering Ethics
|March 29, 2001
PubMed
Summary

This paper reviews ten key lessons since 1989 on managing scientific misconduct allegations in U.S. Public Health Service-funded biomedical and behavioral research.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Whistleblower protection.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1996
Same author

Whistleblower protection.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1996
Same author

Psychosocial intervention: a way out for chronic patients.

Hospital & community psychiatry·1982
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Research
  • Behavioral Science
  • Research Integrity

Background:

  • Scientific misconduct poses a significant threat to research integrity.
  • Effective handling of misconduct allegations is crucial for public trust.
  • The U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) supports a vast amount of biomedical and behavioral research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To distill essential lessons learned over three decades regarding scientific misconduct.
  • To provide guidance on best practices for addressing allegations in PHS-funded research.
  • To enhance the integrity and reliability of biomedical and behavioral research.

Main Methods:

  • Review of policies and procedures for handling scientific misconduct allegations.
  • Analysis of cases and outcomes since 1989.
  • Synthesis of practical lessons for research institutions and funding agencies.

Main Results:

  • Ten distinct lessons have been identified concerning the investigation and adjudication of misconduct.
  • These lessons cover aspects from initial inquiry to final decision-making.
  • The findings highlight the importance of fairness, transparency, and timeliness.

Conclusions:

  • Adherence to established principles and learned lessons strengthens the scientific process.
  • Proactive measures and continuous improvement in handling misconduct are vital.
  • Maintaining research integrity is a shared responsibility among researchers, institutions, and funders.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchLegal ApproachOffice of Research IntegrityPublic Health Service

Related Experiment Videos