Related Experiment Videos
Implementing dual diagnosis services for clients with severe mental illness
R E Drake1, S M Essock, A Shaner
1New Hampshire--Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center, Lebanon, New Hamphire 03766, USA. robert.e.drake@dartmouth.edu
Psychiatric Services (Washington, D.C.)
|March 29, 2001
Summary
Dual diagnosis services, integrating mental health and substance abuse care, are becoming evidence-based for severe mental illness. Effective programs require tailored interventions, comprehensive support, and addressing implementation barriers for quality care.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Addiction Medicine
- Public Health
Background:
- Dual diagnosis, the co-occurrence of severe mental illness and substance use disorders, presents complex challenges in treatment.
- Existing mental health services often struggle to adequately address the dual needs of these clients.
- Evidence-based practices for dual diagnosis are crucial for improving client outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline the critical components of effective dual diagnosis programs.
- To identify barriers to implementing high-quality dual diagnosis services.
- To propose strategies for overcoming these implementation barriers.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature and clinical experience in dual diagnosis treatment.
- Description of essential program elements: comprehensive, long-term, staged recovery; assertive outreach; motivational interventions; skill-building; and cultural competence.
- Analysis of organizational, policy, and training factors influencing service implementation.
Main Results:
- Effective dual diagnosis programs integrate mental health and substance abuse interventions tailored to comorbid disorders.
- High-quality dual diagnosis services are currently rare despite implementation efforts in many state systems.
- Key components include a staged recovery approach, assertive outreach, motivational techniques, skill acquisition, and cultural sensitivity.
Conclusions:
- Dual diagnosis services are emerging as an evidence-based practice requiring integrated, tailored interventions.
- Significant barriers to implementing high-quality services exist, necessitating policy, organizational, and training changes.
- Successful implementation requires a clear mission, structural support, clinician training, and consumer/family education for advocacy.