Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

g and the one-many problem: is one enough?

N Brody1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06459, USA.

Novartis Foundation Symposium
|March 30, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An immunohistochemical panel to assess ultraviolet radiation-associated oxidative skin injury.

Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD·2014
Same author

Second International Symposium on Onychomycosis, Florence, Italy, September 28-29, 1995.

International journal of dermatology·1997
Same author

Cutaneous fungal infections: innovative treatment schedules with systemic agents.

International journal of dermatology·1995
Same author

A new technique for laser treatment of cutaneous tumors.

The Journal of dermatologic surgery and oncology·1986
Same author

Biologic effectiveness of black light fluorescent lamps for PUVA.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology·1985
Same author

Auditory and visual imagery in free recall.

The Journal of psychology·1984
Same journal

Genetic and therapeutic control of diabetogenic CD8+ T cells.

Novartis Foundation symposium·2009
Same journal

Translating mucosal antigen based prevention of autoimmune diabetes to human.

Novartis Foundation symposium·2009
Same journal

Re-establishing immune tolerance in type 1 diabetes via regulatory T cells.

Novartis Foundation symposium·2009
Same journal

Immune markers of disease and therapeutic intervention in type 1 diabetes.

Novartis Foundation symposium·2009
Same journal

Towards a curative therapy in type 1 diabetes: remission of autoimmunity, maintenance and augmentation of beta cell mass.

Novartis Foundation symposium·2009
Same journal

CD8 and cytotoxic T cells in type 1 diabetes.

Novartis Foundation symposium·2009
See all related articles

The general intelligence factor (g) is a heritable trait explaining intelligence differences and influencing social outcomes. Despite criticisms, this paper defends g's central role in intelligence research.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Behavioral Genetics
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • The construct of general intelligence (g) faces criticism regarding its necessity and dominance in intelligence research.
  • Alternative viewpoints question the hegemonic status of g in understanding individual differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To defend the hegemonic status of the general intelligence factor (g).
  • To address and refute diverse criticisms leveled against the g construct.
  • To elucidate the role of g in intelligence and its relation to other factors.

Main Methods:

  • Review and consideration of various criticisms against the g construct.
  • Argumentation for the central role of g based on empirical evidence.
  • Analysis of the heritability and explanatory power of g.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The general intelligence factor (g) is a heritable component of intelligence.
  • g accounts for approximately 50% of the covariance among diverse intelligence measures.
  • g influences a wide range of social outcomes, with shared genetic influences.

Conclusions:

  • The general intelligence factor (g) remains a crucial and defensible construct in intelligence research.
  • g's heritability and influence on cognitive and social outcomes support its central position.
  • Common genetic factors underlie the relationships between g, information processing, and social outcomes.