Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

General intelligence and the definition of phenotypes.

D K Detterman¹

¹Department of Psychology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.

Novartis Foundation Symposium

|March 30, 2001

Summary

General intelligence (g) is a crucial psychological construct, but it is a statistical abstraction, not a single entity. Further research is needed to identify the basic cognitive processes comprising g for scientific progress.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

They doth protest too much.

The American psychologist·1998

Same author

Dopamine markers and general cognitive ability.

Neuroreport·1998

Same author

What is so special about special education?

The American psychologist·1997

Same author

No association between general cognitive ability and the A1 allele of the D2 dopamine receptor gene.

Behavior genetics·1997

Same author

The independent prediction of general intelligence by elementary cognitive tasks: genetic and environmental influences.

Behavior genetics·1996

Same author

The genetic and environmental variance underlying elementary cognitive tasks.

Behavior genetics·1995

Area of Science:

Psychology
Cognitive Science
Neuroscience

Background:

General intelligence (g) has been consistently identified as the primary factor defining intellectual functioning since Spearman's 1904 paper.
Empirical evidence overwhelmingly supports 'g' as the most significant psychological construct, predicting a wide range of behaviors.

Purpose of the Study:

To critically evaluate the current definition of 'g' as the perfect phenotypic definition of intelligence.
To propose a more elaborate definition of intelligence that moves beyond 'g' as a statistical abstraction.

Main Methods:

The study reviews historical and current factor analytic research on intelligence.
It analyzes the limitations of 'g' as a singular construct and advocates for identifying its constituent cognitive processes.

Main Results:

The paper argues that 'g' is not a single underlying entity but a complex system of separable basic cognitive processes.
These processes are integrated in the brain, making them challenging to isolate and identify.

Conclusions:

The current understanding of 'g' is incomplete as it lacks detail on its composition.
Identifying and relating these basic cognitive processes to brain function is essential for advancing the scientific understanding of intelligence and overcoming current research limitations.

Related Experiment Videos